Greenwald Vs. Maryland

Greenwald vs Maryland

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-20-1960

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99857

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/99857
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-20-1960
Case Number: 363 U.S. 721
Subject: Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue: Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Greenwald

Respondent

Maryland

Excerpt

greenwald v. maryland - 363 u.s. 721 (1960) u.s. supreme court greenwald v. maryland, 363 u.s. 721 (1960) 363 u.s. 721 greenwald v. maryland. appeal from the court of appeals of maryland. no. 920. decided june 20, 1960. appeal dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question. reported below: 221 md. 245, 157 a. 2d 119. harry silbert, a. jerome diener and sidney schlachman for appellant. c. ferdinand sybert, attorney general of maryland, stedman prescott, jr., deputy attorney general, and james h. norris, jr., special assistant attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question. page 363 u.s. 721, 1

Full Judgment

GREENWALD v. MARYLAND - 363 U.S. 721 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court GREENWALD v. MARYLAND, 363 U.S. 721 (1960) 363 U.S. 721

GREENWALD v. MARYLAND.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 920.
Decided June 20, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question.

Reported below: 221 Md. 245, 157 A. 2d 119.

Harry Silbert, A. Jerome Diener and Sidney Schlachman for appellant.

C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland, Stedman Prescott, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, and James H. Norris, Jr., Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question.

Page 363 U.S. 721, 1

Same Parties Greenwald vs Maryland Same Subject Miscellaneous