Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hannah Vs. Larche

Hannah vs Larche

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1959
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99768

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
361 U.S. 910
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hannah

Respondent

Larche

Excerpt

hannah v. larche - 361 u.s. 910 (1959) u.s. supreme court hannah v. larche, 361 u.s. 910 361 u.s. 910 john a. hannah et al., appellants, v. margaret m. larche et al. no. 549. john a. hannah et al., petitioners, v. j. a. h. slawson et al. no. 550. supreme court of the united states december 7, 1959 solicitor general rankin, acting assistant attorney general ryan and messrs. harold h. greene and david rubin, for appellants in no. 549. solicitor general rankin, acting assistant attorney general ryan and mr. harold h. greene, for petitioners in no. 550. upon consideration of the motion to advance filed by the solicitor general wherein he states that his brief on the merits will be filed on or before december 15, 1959, the court directs that on or before wednesday, january 13, 1960, the appellees shall file any motion or motions responsive to the statement as to jurisdiction and on the merits of the case, the respondents shall file any brief relating to the granting or denying of the petition for writ of certiorari and on the merits of the case, and the cases are set for oral argument on monday, january 18, 1960, on the petition for writ of certiorari, the jurisdiction on appeal, and on the merits of the cases. the cases are consolidated for the purpose of this argument and a total of four hours is allowed.

Full Judgment

HANNAH v. LARCHE - 361 U.S. 910 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court HANNAH v. LARCHE, 361 U.S. 910

361 U.S. 910

John A. HANNAH et al., appellants,
v.
Margaret M. LARCHE et al.
No. 549.

John A. HANNAH et al., petitioners,
v.
J. A. H. SLAWSON et al.

No. 550.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 7, 1959

Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Ryan and Messrs. Harold H. Greene and David Rubin, for appellants in No. 549.

Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Ryan and Mr. Harold H. Greene, for petitioners in No. 550.

Upon consideration of the motion to advance filed by the Solicitor General wherein he states that his brief on the merits will be filed on or before December 15, 1959, the Court directs that on or before Wednesday, January 13, 1960, the appellees shall file any motion or motions responsive to the statement as to jurisdiction and on the merits of the case, the respondents shall file any brief relating to the granting or denying of the petition for writ of certiorari and on the merits of the case, and the cases are set for oral argument on Monday, January 18, 1960, on the petition for writ of certiorari, the jurisdiction on appeal, and on the merits of the cases.

The cases are consolidated for the purpose of this argument and a total of four hours is allowed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial