Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Naacp Vs. Bennett

Naacp vs Bennett

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-22-1959
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99626

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
360 U.S. 471
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Naacp

Respondent

Bennett

Excerpt

naacp v. bennett - 360 u.s. 471 (1959) u.s. supreme court naacp v. bennett, 360 u.s. 471 (1959) national association for the advancement of colored people, inc. v. bennett no. 757 decided june 22, 1959 360 u.s. 471 appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of arkansas syllabus case challenging constitutionality of state statute should not automatically be referred by federal district court to state courts for construction of statute. per curiam. when the validity of a state statute, challenged under the united states constitution, is properly for adjudication before a united states district court, reference to the state courts for construction of the statute should not automatically be made. the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the united states district court for the eastern district of arkansas for consideration in light of harrison v. naacp, 360 u. s. 167 . judgment vacated and case remanded. mr. justice douglas, with whom the chief justice and mr. justice brennan concurs, dissenting. while i agree that the case should be remanded to the district court, i think that court should be directed to pass on the constitutional issues presented without prior reference to the state courts. my reasons are stated in my dissent in harrison v. naacp, 360 u. s. 167 , 360 u. s. 179 .

Full Judgment

NAACP v. Bennett - 360 U.S. 471 (1959)
U.S. Supreme Court NAACP v. Bennett, 360 U.S. 471 (1959)

National Association for the Advancement of

Colored People, Inc. v. Bennett

No. 757

Decided June 22, 1959

360 U.S. 471

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

SYLLABUS

Case challenging constitutionality of state statute should not automatically be referred by federal district court to state courts for construction of statute.

PER CURIAM.

When the validity of a state statute, challenged under the United States Constitution, is properly for adjudication before a United States District Court, reference to the state courts for construction of the statute should not automatically be made. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas for consideration in light of Harrison v. NAACP, 360 U. S. 167 .

Judgment vacated and case remanded.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, with whom THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN concurs, dissenting.

While I agree that the case should be remanded to the District Court, I think that court should be directed to pass on the constitutional issues presented without prior reference to the state courts. My reasons are stated in my dissent in Harrison v. NAACP, 360 U. S. 167 , 360 U. S. 179 .

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial