Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Aaron Vs. Cooper

Aaron vs Cooper

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1958
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99548

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
358 U.S. 27
Subject
Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Direct Taxation

Key legal issue
Direct Taxation

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Aaron

Respondent

Cooper

Excerpt

.....the order of judge lemley. the court is advised that the opening date of the high school will be september 15. in light of this, and representations made by counsel for the school board as to the board's plan for filing its petition for certiorari, the court makes the following order: 1. the school board's petition for certiorari may be filed not later than september 8, 1958. 2. the briefs of both parties on the merits may be filed not later than september 10, 1958. 3. the solicitor general is invited to file a brief by september 10, 1958, and to present oral argument if he is so advised. page 358 u.s. 27 , 28 4. the rules of the court requiring printing of the petition, briefs, and record are dispensed with. 5. oral argument upon the petition for certiorari is set for september 11, 1958, at twelve o'clock noon. 6. action on the petitioners' application addressed to the stay of the mandate of the court of appeals and to the stay of the order of the district court of june 21, 1958, is deferred pending the disposition of the petition for certiorari duly filed in accordance with the foregoing schedule. mr. thurgood marshall, new york city, for petitioners. mr. richard c. butler, little rock, ark., for respondents. mr. solicitor general, j. lee rankin, washington, d. c., for the united states.

Full Judgment

AARON v. COOPER - 358 U.S. 27 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court AARON v. COOPER , 358 U.S. 27 (1958)

358 U.S. 27

John AARON et al., petitioners,
v.
William G. COOPER et al.
No. 1, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States

August 28, 1958

Page 358 U.S. 27 , 27

Having considered the oral arguments, the Court is in agreement with the view expressed by counsel for the respective parties and by the Solicitor General that petitioners' present application respecting the stay of the mandate of the Court of Appeals and of the order of the District Court of June 21, 1958, necessarily involves consideration of the merits of the Court of Appeals decision reversing the order of Judge Lemley. The Court is advised that the opening date of the High School will be September 15. In light of this, and representations made by counsel for the School Board as to the Board's plan for filing its petition for certiorari, the Court makes the following order:

1. The School Board's petition for certiorari may be filed not later than September 8, 1958.

2. The briefs of both parties on the merits may be filed not later than September 10, 1958.

3. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief by September 10, 1958, and to present oral argument if he is so advised.

Page 358 U.S. 27 , 28

4. The Rules of the Court requiring printing of the petition, briefs, and record are dispensed with.

5. Oral argument upon the petition for certiorari is set for September 11, 1958, at twelve o'clock noon.

6. Action on the petitioners' application addressed to the stay of the mandate of the Court of Appeals and to the stay of the order of the District Court of June 21, 1958, is deferred pending the disposition of the petition for certiorari duly filed in accordance with the foregoing schedule.

Mr. Thurgood Marshall, New York City, for petitioners.

Mr. Richard C. Butler, Little Rock, Ark., for respondents.

Mr. Solicitor General, J. Lee Rankin, Washington, D. C., for the United States.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial