State of WisconsIn Vs. State of Illinois

State of Wisconsin vs State of Illinois

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1958

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99543

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/99543
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1958
Case Number: 355 U.S. 944
Subject: Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue: Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

State of Wisconsin

Respondent

State of Illinois

Excerpt

state of wisconsin v. state of illinois - 355 u.s. 944 (1958) u.s. supreme court state of wisconsin v. state of illinois , 355 u.s. 944 (1958) 355 u.s. 944 the state of wisconsin et al., complainants, v. the state of illinois and sanitary district of chicago et al. no. 2, original. the state of michigan, complainant, v. the state of illinois and sanitary district of chicago et al. no. 3, original. state of new york, complainant, v. state of illinois and sanitary district of chicago et al. no. 4, original. supreme court of the united states march 3, 1958 messrs. stewart g. honeck, atty. gen., and ray tulane, asst. atty. gen., for state of wisconsin; miles lord, atty. gen., and melvin j. peterson, deputy atty. gen., for state of minnesota; william saxbe, atty. gen., and robert e. boyd, asst. atty. gen., for state of ohio; thomas d. mcbride, atty gen., and lois g. forer, deputy atty. gen., for state of pennsylvania; thomas m. kavanagh, atty. gen., samuel j. torina, sol. gen., and nicholas v. page 355 u.s. 944 , 945 olds, asst. atty. gen., for state of michigan; and louis j. lefkowitz, atty. gen., and john r. davison, sol. gen., for state of new york, applicants-complainants. messrs. latham castle, atty. gen., of illinois, william c. wines, asst. atty. gen., russell w. root, lawrence j. fenlon, joseph b. fleming and thomas m. thomas, for defendants. mr. frederick m. rowe, for defendants state of illinois and metropolitan sanitary district of greater chicago. solicitor general rankin, messrs. john f. davis and david r. warner, for the united states, as amicus curiae. the application and motion herein are denied, with leave to renew the application and motion with allegations made more definite and certain as a basis for the relief sought.

Full Judgment

STATE OF WISCONSIN v. STATE OF ILLINOIS - 355 U.S. 944 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court STATE OF WISCONSIN v. STATE OF ILLINOIS , 355 U.S. 944 (1958)

355 U.S. 944

The STATE OF WISCONSIN et al., complainants,
v.
The STATE OF ILLINOIS and Sanitary District of Chicago et al.
No. 2, Original.

The STATE OF MICHIGAN, complainant,
v.
The STATE OF ILLINOIS and Sanitary District of Chicago et al.
No. 3, Original.

STATE OF NEW YORK, complainant,
v.
STATE OF ILLINOIS and Sanitary District of Chicago et al.
No. 4, Original.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 3, 1958

Messrs. Stewart G. Honeck, Atty. Gen., and Ray Tulane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for State of Wisconsin; Miles Lord, Atty. Gen., and Melvin J. Peterson, Deputy Atty. Gen., for State of Minnesota; William Saxbe, Atty. Gen., and Robert E. Boyd, Asst. Atty. Gen., for State of Ohio; Thomas D. McBride, Atty Gen., and Lois G. Forer, Deputy Atty. Gen., for State of Pennsylvania; Thomas M. Kavanagh, Atty. Gen., Samuel J. Torina, Sol. Gen., and Nicholas V.

Page 355 U.S. 944 , 945

Olds, Asst. Atty. Gen., for State of Michigan; and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., and John R. Davison, Sol. Gen., for State of New York, applicants-complainants.

Messrs. Latham Castle, Atty. Gen., of Illinois, William C. Wines, Asst. Atty. Gen., Russell W. Root, Lawrence J. Fenlon, Joseph B. Fleming and Thomas M. Thomas, for defendants.

Mr. Frederick M. Rowe, for defendants State of Illinois and Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago.

Solicitor General Rankin, Messrs. John F. Davis and David R. Warner, for the United States, as amicus curiae.

The application and motion herein are denied, with leave to renew the application and motion with allegations made more definite and certain as a basis for the relief sought.

Same Parties State of Wisconsin vs State of Illinois Same Subject Miscellaneous