Bartkus Vs. Illinois

Bartkus vs illinois

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jan-06-1958

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99537

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/99537
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jan-06-1958
Case Number: 355 U.S. 281
Subject: Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue: Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bartkus

Respondent

illinois

Excerpt

bartkus v. illinois - 355 u.s. 281 (1958) u.s. supreme court bartkus v. illinois, 355 u.s. 281 (1958) 355 u.s. 281 bartkus v. illinois. certiorari to the supreme court of illinois. no. 39. argued november 19, 1957. decided january 6, 1958. 7 ill. 2d 138, 130 n. e. 2d 187, affirmed by an equally divided court. walter t. fisher, acting under appointment by the court, 352 u.s. 958, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. william c. wines, assistant attorney general of illinois, argued the cause for respondent. with him on the brief were latham castle, attorney general, and theodore g. maheras, assistant attorney general. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed by an equally divided court. mr. justice brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 355 u.s. 281, 282

Full Judgment

BARTKUS v. ILLINOIS - 355 U.S. 281 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court BARTKUS v. ILLINOIS, 355 U.S. 281 (1958) 355 U.S. 281

BARTKUS v. ILLINOIS.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 39.
Argued November 19, 1957.
Decided January 6, 1958.

7 Ill. 2d 138, 130 N. E. 2d 187, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Walter T. Fisher, acting under appointment by the Court, 352 U.S. 958, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Latham Castle, Attorney General, and Theodore G. Maheras, Assistant Attorney General.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 355 U.S. 281, 282