Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

United States Vs. Diamond

United States vs Diamond

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-07-1958
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99469

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
356 U.S. 257
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

United States

Respondent

Diamond

Excerpt

united states v. diamond - 356 u.s. 257 (1958) u.s. supreme court united states v. diamond, 356 u.s. 257 (1958) 356 u.s. 257 united states v. diamond, alias dumanus, thornson and slater, et al. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. no. 771. decided april 7, 1958. certiorari granted and judgment affirmed. reported below: 255 f.2d 749 . solicitor general rankin, acting assistant attorney general mclean, beatrice rosenberg and j. f. bishop for the united states. robert l. brock for david diamond, respondent. per curiam. the petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is affirmed. page 356 u.s. 257, 258

Full Judgment

UNITED STATES v. DIAMOND - 356 U.S. 257 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. DIAMOND, 356 U.S. 257 (1958) 356 U.S. 257

UNITED STATES v. DIAMOND, ALIAS DUMANUS, THORNSON AND SLATER, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 771.
Decided April 7, 1958.

Certiorari granted and judgment affirmed.

Reported below: 255 F.2d 749 .

Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General McLean, Beatrice Rosenberg and J. F. Bishop for the United States.

Robert L. Brock for David Diamond, respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 356 U.S. 257, 258



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial