Matles Vs. United States

Matles vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-07-1958

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99468

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/99468
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Apr-07-1958
Case Number: 356 U.S. 256
Subject: Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Direct Taxation

Key legal issue: Direct Taxation

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Matles

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

..... 247 f.2d 123 , 384, judgments reversed and cases remanded to district court with directions to dismiss the complaints. [ footnote * ] together with no. 450, lucchese v. united states, and no. 494, costello v. united states, also on petitions for writs of certiorari to the same court. frank j. donner, arthur kinoy and marshall perlin for petitioner in no. 378. richard j. burke for petitioner in no. 450. edward bennett williams and morris shilensky for petitioner in no. 494. solicitor general rankin, warren olney, iii, then assistant attorney general, beatrice rosenberg and j. f. bishop for the united states in nos. 378 and 450. mr. rankin, acting assistant attorney general mclean, miss rosenberg and eugene l. grimm for the united states in no. 494. page 356 u.s. 256, 257 per curiam. the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. in no. 378 the judgment of the court of appeals for the second circuit is reversed and the case is remanded to the district court with directions to vacate the order holding the petitioner in contempt and to dismiss the complaint. in nos. 450 and 494 the judgments of the court of appeals for the second circuit are reversed and the cases are remanded to the district court with directions to dismiss the complaints. an affidavit showing good cause is a prerequisite to the initiation of denaturalization proceedings. the affidavit must be filed with the complaint when the proceedings are instituted. united states v. zucca, 351 u.s. 91, 99 -100.

Full Judgment

MATLES v. UNITED STATES - 356 U.S. 256 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court MATLES v. UNITED STATES, 356 U.S. 256 (1958) 356 U.S. 256

MATLES v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 378.
Decided April 7, 1958. *

Certiorari granted.

An affidavit showing good cause is a prerequisite to the initiation of denaturalization proceedings, and such affidavit must be filed with the complaint when the proceedings are instituted. United States v. Zucca, 351 U.S. 91 .

No. 378: 247 F.2d 378 , judgment reversed and case remanded to District Court with directions to vacate the order holding petitioner in contempt and to dismiss the complaint.

Nos. 450 and 494: 247 F.2d 123 , 384, judgments reversed and cases remanded to District Court with directions to dismiss the complaints.

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 450, Lucchese v. United States, and No. 494, Costello v. United States, also on petitions for writs of certiorari to the same Court.

Frank J. Donner, Arthur Kinoy and Marshall Perlin for petitioner in No. 378.

Richard J. Burke for petitioner in No. 450.

Edward Bennett Williams and Morris Shilensky for petitioner in No. 494.

Solicitor General Rankin, Warren Olney, III, then Assistant Attorney General, Beatrice Rosenberg and J. F. Bishop for the United States in Nos. 378 and 450. Mr. Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General McLean, Miss Rosenberg and Eugene L. Grimm for the United States in No. 494.

Page 356 U.S. 256, 257

PER CURIAM.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. In No. 378 the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to vacate the order holding the petitioner in contempt and to dismiss the complaint. In Nos. 450 and 494 the judgments of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit are reversed and the cases are remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the complaints. An affidavit showing good cause is a prerequisite to the initiation of denaturalization proceedings. The affidavit must be filed with the complaint when the proceedings are instituted. United States v. Zucca, 351 U.S. 91, 99 -100.

Same Parties Matles vs United States Same Subject Direct Taxation