Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hill Vs. United States

Hill vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-02-1958
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99423

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
356 U.S. 704
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hill

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

hill v. united states - 356 u.s. 704 (1958) u.s. supreme court hill v. united states, 356 u.s. 704 (1958) 356 u.s. 704 hill v. united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit. no. 287, misc. decided june 2, 1958. certiorari and leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted; judgment vacated and case remanded for consideration in light of cases cited. reported below: see 101 u.s. app. d.c. 313, 248 f.2d 635 . howard adler, jr. for petitioner. solicitor general rankin, acting assistant attorney general mclean and beatrice rosenberg for the united states. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment of the united states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for consideration in light of ellis v. united states, 356 u.s. 674 , decided may 26, 1958, and also in light of farley v. united states, 354 u.s. 521 ; and johnson v. united states, 352 u.s. 565 . page 356 u.s. 704, 1

Full Judgment

HILL v. UNITED STATES - 356 U.S. 704 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court HILL v. UNITED STATES, 356 U.S. 704 (1958) 356 U.S. 704

HILL v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 287, Misc.
Decided June 2, 1958.

Certiorari and leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted; judgment vacated and case remanded for consideration in light of cases cited.

Reported below: See 101 U.S. App. D.C. 313, 248 F.2d 635 .

Howard Adler, Jr. for petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General McLean and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for consideration in light of Ellis v. United States, 356 U.S. 674 , decided May 26, 1958, and also in light of Farley v. United States, 354 U.S. 521 ; and Johnson v. United States, 352 U.S. 565 .

Page 356 U.S. 704, 1



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial