Rogers Vs. Richmond

Rogers vs Richmond

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-16-1958

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99414

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/99414
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-16-1958
Case Number: 357 U.S. 220
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rogers

Respondent

Richmond

Excerpt

rogers v. richmond - 357 u.s. 220 (1958) u.s. supreme court rogers v. richmond, 357 u.s. 220 (1958) 357 u.s. 220 rogers v. richmond, warden. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit. no. 755, misc. decided june 16, 1958. certiorari denied with statement as to effect of opinion of court of appeals in 252 f.2d 807 . louis h. pollak for petitioner. abraham s. ullman for respondent. per curiam. the petition for writ of certiorari is denied. we read the opinion of the court of appeals as holding that while the district judge may, unless he finds a vital flaw in the state court proceedings, accept the determination in such proceedings, he need not deem such determination binding, and may take testimony. see brown v. allen, 344 u.s. 443, 506 , et seq. page 357 u.s. 220, 221

Full Judgment

ROGERS v. RICHMOND - 357 U.S. 220 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court ROGERS v. RICHMOND, 357 U.S. 220 (1958) 357 U.S. 220

ROGERS v. RICHMOND, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 755, Misc.
Decided June 16, 1958.

Certiorari denied with statement as to effect of opinion of Court of Appeals in 252 F.2d 807 .

Louis H. Pollak for petitioner.

Abraham S. Ullman for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied. We read the opinion of the Court of Appeals as holding that while the District Judge may, unless he finds a vital flaw in the State Court proceedings, accept the determination in such proceedings, he need not deem such determination binding, and may take testimony. See Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 506 , et seq.

Page 357 U.S. 220, 221

Same Parties Rogers vs Richmond Same Subject Land Acquisition