Skip to content


Rogers Vs. Richmond - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

US Supreme Court

Decided On

Case Number

357 U.S. 220

Appellant

Rogers

Respondent

Richmond

Excerpt:


rogers v. richmond - 357 u.s. 220 (1958) u.s. supreme court rogers v. richmond, 357 u.s. 220 (1958) 357 u.s. 220 rogers v. richmond, warden. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit. no. 755, misc. decided june 16, 1958. certiorari denied with statement as to effect of opinion of court of appeals in 252 f.2d 807 . louis h. pollak for petitioner. abraham s. ullman for respondent. per curiam. the petition for writ of certiorari is denied. we read the opinion of the court of appeals as holding that while the district judge may, unless he finds a vital flaw in the state court proceedings, accept the determination in such proceedings, he need not deem such determination binding, and may take testimony. see brown v. allen, 344 u.s. 443, 506 , et seq. page 357 u.s. 220, 221

Judgment:


ROGERS v. RICHMOND - 357 U.S. 220 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court ROGERS v. RICHMOND, 357 U.S. 220 (1958) 357 U.S. 220

ROGERS v. RICHMOND, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 755, Misc.
Decided June 16, 1958.

Certiorari denied with statement as to effect of opinion of Court of Appeals in 252 F.2d 807 .

Louis H. Pollak for petitioner.

Abraham S. Ullman for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied. We read the opinion of the Court of Appeals as holding that while the District Judge may, unless he finds a vital flaw in the State Court proceedings, accept the determination in such proceedings, he need not deem such determination binding, and may take testimony. See Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 506 , et seq.

Page 357 U.S. 220, 221




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //