Fellom Vs. Redevelopment Agy., City and Cty., San Francisco

Fellom vs Redevelopment Agy., City and Cty., San Francisco

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-27-1958

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99339

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/99339
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Oct-27-1958
Case Number: 358 U.S. 56
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Fellom

Respondent

Redevelopment Agy., City and Cty., San Francisco

Excerpt

fellom v. redevelopment agy., city & cty., san francisco - 358 u.s. 56 (1958) u.s. supreme court fellom v. redevelopment agy., city & cty., san francisco, 358 u.s. 56 (1958) 358 u.s. 56 fellom et al. v. redevelopment agency of the city and county of san francisco et al. appeal from the district court of appeal of california, first appellate district. no. 323. decided october 27, 1958. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 157 cal. app. 2d 243, 320 p.2d 884. appellants pro se. dion r. holm and george e. baglin for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 358 u.s. 56, 57

Full Judgment

FELLOM v. REDEVELOPMENT AGY., CITY & CTY., SAN FRANCISCO - 358 U.S. 56 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court FELLOM v. REDEVELOPMENT AGY., CITY & CTY., SAN FRANCISCO, 358 U.S. 56 (1958) 358 U.S. 56

FELLOM ET AL. v. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF
SAN FRANCISCO ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 323.
Decided October 27, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 157 Cal. App. 2d 243, 320 P.2d 884.

Appellants pro se.

Dion R. Holm and George E. Baglin for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 358 U.S. 56, 57

Same Parties Fellom vs Redevelopment Agy., City and Cty., San Francisco Same Subject Criminal