Briggs Vs. Los Angeles

Briggs vs Los Angeles

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Dec-15-1958

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99317

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/99317
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Dec-15-1958
Case Number: 358 U.S. 205
Subject: Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue: Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Briggs

Respondent

Los Angeles

Excerpt

briggs v. los angeles - 358 u.s. 205 (1958) u.s. supreme court briggs v. los angeles, 358 u.s. 205 (1958) 358 u.s. 205 briggs, doing business as walt's auto parks & garages, v. city of los angeles et al. appeal from the district court of appeal of california, second appellate district. no. 453. decided december 15, 1958. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 154 cal. app. 2d 642, 316 p.2d 408. morris lavine for appellant. roger arnebergh and philip e. grey for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 358 u.s. 205, 206

Full Judgment

BRIGGS v. LOS ANGELES - 358 U.S. 205 (1958)
U.S. Supreme Court BRIGGS v. LOS ANGELES, 358 U.S. 205 (1958) 358 U.S. 205

BRIGGS, DOING BUSINESS AS WALT'S AUTO PARKS & GARAGES, v. CITY
OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 453.
Decided December 15, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 154 Cal. App. 2d 642, 316 P.2d 408.

Morris Lavine for appellant.

Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 358 U.S. 205, 206

Same Parties Briggs vs Los Angeles Same Subject Miscellaneous