Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Blackburn Vs. Alabama

Blackburn vs Alabama

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-17-1957
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99219

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
354 U.S. 393
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Blackburn

Respondent

Alabama

Excerpt

blackburn v. alabama - 354 u.s. 393 (1957) u.s. supreme court blackburn v. alabama, 354 u.s. 393 (1957) blackburn v. alabama no. 426 argued may 2, 1957 decided june 17, 1957 354 u.s. 393 certiorari to the court of appeals of alabama syllabus on the record in this case, it is uncertain whether petitioner's claim to protection under the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment was passed on by the state court of appeals, and the judgment of the court is vacated and the cause remanded to that court so that it may pass on that claim. 38 ala.app. 143, 88 so.2d 199, judgment vacated and cause remanded. per curiam. the record in this case leaves us uncertain whether petitioner's claim to the protection of the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment to the united states constitution was passed upon by the court of appeals of alabama. 38 ala.app. 143, 88 so.2d 199. accordingly, we vacate the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the cause to that court in order that it may pass upon this claim. minnesota v. national tea co., 309 u. s. 551 . mr. justice douglas, with whom the chief justice and mr. justice brennan concur, dissenting. petitioner has made as strong a showing as possible that he signed the confession when he was insane. throughout the whole proceeding, he has claimed that the confession was involuntary. the judgment should therefore be reversed. see chambers v. florida, 309 u. s. 227 ; leyra v. denno, 347 u. s. 556 .

Full Judgment

Blackburn v. Alabama - 354 U.S. 393 (1957)
U.S. Supreme Court Blackburn v. Alabama, 354 U.S. 393 (1957)

Blackburn v. Alabama

No. 426

Argued May 2, 1957

Decided June 17, 1957

354 U.S. 393

CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF ALABAMA

SYLLABUS

on the record in this case, it is uncertain whether petitioner's claim to protection under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment was passed on by the State Court of Appeals, and the judgment of the Court is vacated and the cause remanded to that Court so that it may pass on that claim.

38 Ala.App. 143, 88 So.2d 199, judgment vacated and cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The record in this case leaves us uncertain whether petitioner's claim to the protection of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was passed upon by the Court of Appeals of Alabama. 38 Ala.App. 143, 88 So.2d 199. Accordingly, we vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand the cause to that court in order that it may pass upon this claim. Minnesota v. National Tea Co., 309 U. S. 551 .

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, with whom THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN concur, dissenting.

Petitioner has made as strong a showing as possible that he signed the confession when he was insane. Throughout the whole proceeding, he has claimed that the confession was involuntary. The Judgment should therefore be reversed. See Chambers v. Florida, 309 U. S. 227 ; Leyra v. Denno, 347 U. S. 556 .

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial