Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Cano Vs. Pennsylvania

Cano vs Pennsylvania

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Dec-09-1957
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99155
CiteSignal

Log in to get a daily email when new judgments cite this order.

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
355 U.S. 182

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cano

Respondent

Pennsylvania

Bonus Feature

AI Brief & Ask

Part of AI Studio: get a comprehensive 18-section AI Brief and case-scoped chat on this judgment, plus Verdict Lens, Devil's Bench, and DocMind from the AI Studio hub.

Log in to unlock AI Studio

Subscribers get structured AI Briefs and case-scoped chat. Learn more.

Excerpt

cano v. pennsylvania - 355 u.s. 182 (1957) u.s. supreme court cano v. pennsylvania, 355 u.s. 182 (1957) 355 u.s. 182 cano et al. v. pennsylvania. appeal from the supreme court of pennsylvania, eastern district. no. 538. decided december 9, 1957. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 389 pa. 639, 133 a. 2d 800. william t. coleman, jr. for appellants. thomas d. mcbride, attorney general of pennsylvania, and leon ehrlich, deputy attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. keco industries v. cincinnati & suburban bell tel. co., 355 u.s. 182 (1957) 355 u.s. 182 (1957) "> u.s. supreme court keco industries v. cincinnati & suburban bell tel. co., 355 u.s. 182 (1957) 355 u.s. 182 keco industries, inc., et al. v. cincinnati & suburban bell telephone co. appeal from the supreme court of ohio. no. 543. decided december 9, 1957. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 166 ohio st. 254, 141 n. e. 2

Full Judgment

CANO v. PENNSYLVANIA - 355 U.S. 182 (1957)
U.S. Supreme Court CANO v. PENNSYLVANIA, 355 U.S. 182 (1957) 355 U.S. 182

CANO ET AL. v. PENNSYLVANIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, EASTERN DISTRICT.
No. 538.
Decided December 9, 1957.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 389 Pa. 639, 133 A. 2d 800.

William T. Coleman, Jr. for appellants.

Thomas D. McBride, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Leon Ehrlich, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


KECO INDUSTRIES v. CINCINNATI & SUBURBAN BELL TEL. CO., <a href="/99155"> 355 U.S. 182 </a> (1957) 355 U.S. 182 (1957) "> U.S. Supreme Court KECO INDUSTRIES v. CINCINNATI & SUBURBAN BELL TEL. CO., 355 U.S. 182 (1957) 355 U.S. 182

KECO INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL. v. CINCINNATI & SUBURBAN BELL TELEPHONE CO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 543.
Decided December 9, 1957.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 166 Ohio St. 254, 141 N. E. 2d 465.

Joseph A. Segal for appellants.

Carl M. Jacobs, Jr. for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 355 U.S. 182, 183




Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files

Start your Free Trial