Virginia Vs. Maryland

Virginia vs Maryland

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Dec-16-1957

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/99138

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/99138
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Dec-16-1957
Case Number: 355 U.S. 269
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Virginia

Respondent

Maryland

Excerpt

virginia v. maryland - 355 u.s. 269 (1957) u.s. supreme court virginia v. maryland, 355 u.s. 269 (1957) 355 u.s. 269 virginia v. maryland. on motion for leave to file bill of complaint. no. 12, original. argued december 10, 1957. decided december 16, 1957. virginia granted leave to file bill of complaint; maryland to file answer within 60 days. c. f. hicks, assistant attorney general of virginia, and kenneth c. patty, attorney general, argued the cause and filed a brief for plaintiff. joseph s. kaufman, assistant attorney general of maryland, and c. ferdinand sybert, attorney general, argued the cause for defendant. with them on the brief was edward s. digges, special assistant attorney general. per curiam. the court having heard oral argument by the attorneys general of the states and having considered the printed briefs of counsel, the court is of the opinion that the motion for leave to file the bill of complaint should be granted. the state of maryland is directed to file an answer to the bill of complaint within 60 days and process is ordered to issue accordingly. page 355 u.s. 269, 270

Full Judgment

VIRGINIA v. MARYLAND - 355 U.S. 269 (1957)
U.S. Supreme Court VIRGINIA v. MARYLAND, 355 U.S. 269 (1957) 355 U.S. 269

VIRGINIA v. MARYLAND.
ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BILL OF COMPLAINT.
No. 12, Original.
Argued December 10, 1957.
Decided December 16, 1957.

Virginia granted leave to file bill of complaint; Maryland to file answer within 60 days.

C. F. Hicks, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, and Kenneth C. Patty, Attorney General, argued the cause and filed a brief for plaintiff.

Joseph S. Kaufman, Assistant Attorney General of Maryland, and C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General, argued the cause for defendant. With them on the brief was Edward S. Digges, Special Assistant Attorney General.

PER CURIAM.

The Court having heard oral argument by the Attorneys General of the States and having considered the printed briefs of counsel, the Court is of the opinion that the motion for leave to file the bill of complaint should be granted. The State of Maryland is directed to file an answer to the bill of complaint within 60 days and process is ordered to issue accordingly.

Page 355 U.S. 269, 270

Same Parties Virginia vs Maryland Same Subject Land Acquisition