Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re Disbarment of Isserman

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-14-1954
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/98884

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
348 U.S. 1
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re Disbarment of Isserman

Excerpt

in re disbarment of isserman - 348 u.s. 1 (1954) u.s. supreme court in re disbarment of isserman, 348 u.s. 1 (1954) in re disbarment of isserman no. 5, misc. october term, 1952 decided october 14, 1954 348 u.s. 1 on petition for rehearing syllabus since a majority of the justices participating do not find ground for disbarment, as required by rule 8 of the present rules of this court, the order of disbarment, 345 u. s. 286 , is set aside, and the rule to show cause is discharged. per curiam. april 6, 1953, an order was entered disbarring isserman from the practice of law in this court pursuant to rule 2, par. 5, of this court's rules then in effect. see in re isserman, 345 u. s. 286 . the order of disbarment is now before us on a petition for rehearing. rule 8 of our present rules provides that "no order of disbarment will be entered except with the concurrence of a majority of the justices participating." the petition for rehearing is granted. a majority of the justices participating do not find ground for disbarment of isserman. accordingly, the former order of disbarment is set aside, and the rule against isserman to show cause is discharged. mr. justice burton, with whom mr. justice reed and mr. justice minton join, dissents for the reasons page 348 u. s. 2 stated in the opinion announced by mr. chief justice vinson, april 6, 1953, in in re isserman, 345 u. s. 286 . mr. justice reed also calls attention to his dissent in sacher v. association of the bar, 347 u. s. 388 , 347 u. s. 390 . the chief justice and mr. justice clark did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Full Judgment

In re Disbarment of Isserman - 348 U.S. 1 (1954)
U.S. Supreme Court In re Disbarment of Isserman, 348 U.S. 1 (1954)

In re Disbarment of Isserman

No. 5, Misc.

October Term, 1952

Decided October 14, 1954

348 U.S. 1

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

SYLLABUS

Since a majority of the Justices participating do not find ground for disbarment, as required by Rule 8 of the present Rules of this Court, the order of disbarment, 345 U. S. 286 , is set aside, and the rule to show cause is discharged.

PER CURIAM.

April 6, 1953, an order was entered disbarring Isserman from the practice of law in this Court pursuant to Rule 2, par. 5, of this Court's Rules then in effect. See In re Isserman, 345 U. S. 286 . The order of disbarment is now before us on a petition for rehearing. Rule 8 of our present Rules provides that "no order of disbarment will be entered except with the concurrence of a majority of the justices participating." The petition for rehearing is granted. A majority of the Justices participating do not find ground for disbarment of Isserman. Accordingly, the former order of disbarment is set aside, and the rule against Isserman to show cause is discharged.

MR. JUSTICE BURTON, with whom MR. JUSTICE REED and MR. JUSTICE MINTON join, dissents for the reasons

Page 348 U. S. 2

stated in the opinion announced by Mr. Chief Justice Vinson, April 6, 1953, in In re Isserman, 345 U. S. 286 .

MR. JUSTICE REED also calls attention to his dissent in Sacher v. Association of the Bar, 347 U. S. 388 , 347 U. S. 390 .

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE CLARK did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial