Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rosenberg Vs. United States

Rosenberg vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-19-1953
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/98775

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
346 U.S. 322
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rosenberg

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

..... 346 u. s. 273 , counsel for the rosenbergs moved for a further stay pending action by the president on a petition for executive clemency. held: further stay denied. mr. justice frankfurter. on the assumption that the sentences against the rosenbergs are to be carried out at 11 o'clock tonight, their counsel ask this court to stay their execution until opportunity has been afforded to them to invoke the constitutional prerogative of clemency. the action of this court, and the division of opinion in vacating the stay granted by mr. justice douglas, are, of course, a factor in the situation, which arose within the last hour. it is not for this court even remotely to enter into the domain of clemency reserved by the constitution exclusively to the president. but the court must properly take into account the possible consequences of a stay or of a denial of a stay of execution of death sentences upon making an appeal for executive clemency. were it established that counsel are correct in their assumption that the sentences of death are to be carried out at 11 p.m. page 346 u. s. 323 tonight, i believe that it would be right and proper for this court formally to grant a stay with a proper time limit to give appropriate opportunity for the process of executive clemency to operate. i justifiably assume, however, that the time for the execution has not been fixed as of 11 o'clock tonight. of course, i respectfully assume that appropriate consideration will be given to a clemency application by the authority constitutionally charged with the clemency function. mr. justice black, dissenting.

Full Judgment

Rosenberg v. United States - 346 U.S. 322 (1953)
U.S. Supreme Court Rosenberg v. United States, 346 U.S. 322 (1953)

Rosenberg v. United States

No.___, June 18 Special Term, 1953

Decided June 19, 1953

346 U.S. 322

MOTION TO VACATE A STAY

SYLLABUS

After the stay granted by MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS had been vacated by the Court, ante, p. 346 U. S. 273 , counsel for the Rosenbergs moved for a further stay pending action by the President on a petition for executive clemency.

Held: further stay denied.

MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER.

On the assumption that the sentences against the Rosenbergs are to be carried out at 11 o'clock tonight, their counsel ask this Court to stay their execution until opportunity has been afforded to them to invoke the constitutional prerogative of clemency. The action of this Court, and the division of opinion in vacating the stay granted by MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, are, of course, a factor in the situation, which arose within the last hour. It is not for this Court even remotely to enter into the domain of clemency reserved by the Constitution exclusively to the President. But the Court must properly take into account the possible consequences of a stay or of a denial of a stay of execution of death sentences upon making an appeal for executive clemency. Were it established that counsel are correct in their assumption that the sentences of death are to be carried out at 11 p.m.

Page 346 U. S. 323

tonight, I believe that it would be right and proper for this Court formally to grant a stay with a proper time limit to give appropriate opportunity for the process of executive clemency to operate. I justifiably assume, however, that the time for the execution has not been fixed as of 11 o'clock tonight. Of course, I respectfully assume that appropriate consideration will be given to a clemency application by the authority constitutionally charged with the clemency function.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, dissenting.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial