Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

State and ors Vs. Magan Lal

State and ors vs Magan Lal

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Jodhpur Decided May 27, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/983825

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan Jodhpur High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

State and ors

Respondent

Magan Lal

Excerpt

88 d.b. civil special appeal no.139/2013 state of rajasthan vs. magan lal & anr. date of order ::27. h may 2013 hon'ble mr. justice dinesh maheshwari hon'ble mr. justice arun bhansali mr. praduman singh, asst to aag, for the appellants. this intra-court appeal, directed against the order dated 20.12.2007 as passed by the learned single judge of this court in cwp no.4011/2006, has come up for admission before the court only in the year 2013 after removal of the defects and after its restoration. the learned counsel for the appellants frankly clarifies that in fact, the petitioner filed a contempt petition and ultimately, the appellants indeed carried out the compliance of the order passed by the learned single judge whereby the appellants were directed to implement the order dated 03.01.2006 as passed by the chief settlement commissioner, hanumangarh and to consider the claim of the petitioner, if any, for further allotment in the light of the provisions of the displaced persons (compensation and rehabilitation) act, 1954. in view of the submissions so made and in the totality of the circumstances, we do not find any reason to entertain this intra-court appeal now at this stage. the appeal stands dismissed. (arun bhansali),j.(dinesh maheshwari),j.cpgoyal/-

Full Judgment

88 D.B. Civil Special Appeal No.139/2013 State of Rajasthan Vs. Magan Lal & Anr. Date of Order ::

27. h May 2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr. Praduman Singh, Asst to AAG, for the appellants. <><><> This intra-court appeal, directed against the order dated 20.12.2007 as passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in CWP No.4011/2006, has come up for admission before the Court only in the year 2013 after removal of the defects and after its restoration. The learned counsel for the appellants frankly clarifies that in fact, the petitioner filed a contempt petition and ultimately, the appellants indeed carried out the compliance of the order passed by the learned Single Judge whereby the appellants were directed to implement the order dated 03.01.2006 as passed by the Chief Settlement Commissioner, Hanumangarh and to consider the claim of the petitioner, if any, for further allotment in the light of the provisions of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954. In view of the submissions so made and in the totality of the circumstances, we do not find any reason to entertain this intra-court appeal now at this stage. The appeal stands dismissed. (ARUN BHANSALI),J.

(DINESH MAHESHWARI),J.

cpgoyal/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial