Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Chandan Singh Vs. State of Raj. and ors

Chandan Singh vs State of Raj. and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Jodhpur Decided May 28, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/983812

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan Jodhpur High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chandan Singh

Respondent

State of Raj. and ors

Excerpt

s.b. civil misc. application no.24/2012 in s.b. civil writ petition no.2540/2010 chandan singh vs. state of rajasthan & ors. order dt:28. 05/2013 1/2 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur order s.b. civil misc. application no.24/2012 in s.b. civil writ petition no.2540/2010 chandan singh vs. state of rajasthan & ors. date of order :::28. h may 2013 present hon'ble dr. justice vineet kothari mr. vishal sharma, for the petitioner/applicant. mr. sundeep bhandawat, for the respondents. -- by the court:1. learned counsel for the petitioner/applicant submits that in compliance of the order dated 12.12.2011 disposing of the writ petition filed by the petitioner being sbcwp no.2540/2010- chandan singh vs. the state of rajasthan & ors., directing him to deposit 30% of the disputed demand of land tax, he has deposited the same, albeit, belatedly on 11.12.2013 and, therefore, the period for filing of the appeal before the competent authority, may now be extended for further period of one month; and if such appeal is preferred by him, the same may be ordered to be decided by the competent authority on merits in accordance with law.2. learned counsel for the respondents does not fairly dispute this position in view of deposit of 30% of the disputed s.b. civil misc. application no.24/2012 in s.b. civil writ petition no.2540/2010 chandan singh vs. state of rajasthan & ors. order dt:28. 05/2013 2/2 demand of land tax made by the petitioner.3. accordingly, the present misc. application is disposed of granting further one month's time to petitioner for the aforesaid purpose. no costs. a copy of this order be sent to the concerned parties forthwith. (dr. vineet kothari), j.dj/- 39

Full Judgment

S.B. Civil Misc. Application No.24/2012 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2540/2010 Chandan Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Order dt:

28. 05/2013 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Misc. Application No.24/2012 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2540/2010 Chandan Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER :::

28. h May 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. Vishal Sharma, for the petitioner/applicant. Mr. Sundeep Bhandawat, for the respondents. -- BY THE COURT:

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner/applicant submits that in compliance of the order dated 12.12.2011 disposing of the writ petition filed by the petitioner being SBCWP No.2540/2010- Chandan Singh Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors., directing him to deposit 30% of the disputed demand of land tax, he has deposited the same, albeit, belatedly on 11.12.2013 and, therefore, the period for filing of the appeal before the competent authority, may now be extended for further period of one month; and if such appeal is preferred by him, the same may be ordered to be decided by the competent authority on merits in accordance with law.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents does not fairly dispute this position in view of deposit of 30% of the disputed S.B. Civil Misc. Application No.24/2012 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2540/2010 Chandan Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Order dt:

28. 05/2013 2/2 demand of land tax made by the petitioner.

3. Accordingly, the present misc. application is disposed of granting further one month's time to petitioner for the aforesaid purpose. No costs. A copy of this order be sent to the concerned parties forthwith. (Dr. VINEET KOTHARI), J.

DJ/- 39

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial