Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sheo Kumar Sah and ors Vs. State of Bihar

Sheo Kumar Sah and ors vs State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided Aug 07, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/983682

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sheo Kumar Sah and ors

Respondent

State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal appeal (sj) no.948 of 2009 ====================================================== 1. sheo kumar sah s/o late chhabila sah 2. dadan sah s/o sri sheo kumar sah 3. ram chandra sah s/o late mishri sah, r/o village - dhobaha p.s. arrah muffasil, distt.- bhojpur. .... .... appellants versus the state of bihar .... .... respondent ===================================================== appearance : for the appellant/s : mr. sumant singh, advocate for the respondent/s : mr. s.n. prasad, additional public prosecutor ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice akhilesh chandra oral judgment date:07. h august 2013 heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned additional public prosecutor for the state.2. the three appellants have preferred this appeal against their conviction for the offences under sections 307, 452 read with 34 of the indian penal code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and three years respectively as awarded by 1st additional sessions judge, f.t.c., bhojpur, ara, on 2 nd december 2009 in session trial no. 142/2000 arising out of ara (mufassil) p.s. case no. 210/99, g.r. no. 2292/99.3. the prosecution case as reveal from exhibit â€

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.948 of 2009 ====================================================== 1. Sheo Kumar Sah S/O Late Chhabila Sah 2. Dadan Sah S/O Sri Sheo Kumar Sah 3. Ram Chandra Sah S/O Late Mishri Sah, R/O Village - Dhobaha P.S. Arrah Muffasil, Distt.- Bhojpur. .... .... Appellants Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent ===================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Sumant Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.N. Prasad, Additional Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL JUDGMENT Date:

07. h August 2013 Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The three appellants have preferred this appeal against their conviction for the offences under sections 307, 452 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and three years respectively as awarded by 1st Additional Sessions judge, F.T.C., Bhojpur, Ara, on 2 nd December 2009 in Session Trial No. 142/2000 arising out of Ara (Mufassil) P.S. Case No. 210/99, G.R. No. 2292/99.

3. The prosecution case as reveal from Exhibit â€

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial