Vinod Kumar Sharma and anr Vs. Virender Kumar Sharma

Vinod Kumar Sharma and anr vs Virender Kumar Sharma

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Jul 22, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/979525

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/979525
Court: Delhi High Court
Judge: Suresh Kait
Decided On: Jul 22, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vinod Kumar Sharma and anr

Respondent

Virender Kumar Sharma

Excerpt

$~45 * in the high court of delhi at new delhi % + judgment delivered on:22. d july, 2013 cm (m) 1200/2012 vinod kumar sharma & anr ..... petitioners through: mr. gaurav duggal and ms. gauhar mirza, advs. versus virender kumar sharma ..... respondent through: mr. sandeep gaur, adv. coram: hon'ble mr. justice suresh kait suresh kait, j.(oral) + cm (m) 1200/2012 1. instant petition has been filed by the petitioners for setting aside the impugned order dated 20.10.2012, whereby the application under order ix rule 7 cpc filed by the petitioners has been dismissed.2. ld. counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the case is listed before the ld. trial court on 07.09.2013 for final arguments.3. he further submits that written statement filed by the petitioners may not be taken on record, however, liberty should be given to them to argue the matter before the court below.4. on the other hand, ld. counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submits that he has no objection if the petitioners argue the matter before the court, however, they shall not insist to take the written statement into consideration.5. in view of the above, ld. judge is directed to allow the petitioners to argue their case and pass the order accordingly.6. in view of the above, the instant petition is disposed of.7. a copy of this order be given dasti to the learned counsels for the parties under the signatures of the court master. cm nos. 18829/2012 (for stay) with the disposal of the petition itself, instant application has become infructuous. the same is disposed of accordingly. suresh kait, j july 22 2013 jg

Full Judgment

$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:

22. d July, 2013 CM (M) 1200/2012 VINOD KUMAR SHARMA & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Gaurav Duggal and Ms. Gauhar Mirza, Advs. versus VIRENDER KUMAR SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Gaur, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.

(Oral) + CM (M) 1200/2012 1. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners for setting aside the impugned order dated 20.10.2012, whereby the application under Order IX Rule 7 CPC filed by the petitioners has been dismissed.

2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the case is listed before the Ld. Trial Court on 07.09.2013 for final arguments.

3. He further submits that written statement filed by the petitioners may not be taken on record, however, liberty should be given to them to argue the matter before the court below.

4. On the other hand, ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submits that he has no objection if the petitioners argue the matter before the court, however, they shall not insist to take the written statement into consideration.

5. In view of the above, Ld. Judge is directed to allow the petitioners to argue their case and pass the order accordingly.

6. In view of the above, the instant petition is disposed of.

7. A copy of this order be given dasti to the learned counsels for the parties under the signatures of the Court Master. CM Nos. 18829/2012 (for stay) With the disposal of the petition itself, instant application has become infructuous. The same is disposed of accordingly. SURESH KAIT, J JULY 22 2013 jg

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2013 Same Parties Vinod Kumar Sharma and anr vs Virender Kumar Sharma Same Subject Education Same Judge Suresh Kait