Bridges Vs. Wixon

Bridges vs Wixon

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1945

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/97882

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/97882
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1945
Case Number: 323 U.S. 708
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bridges

Respondent

Wixon

Excerpt

bridges v. wixon - 323 u.s. 708 (1945) u.s. supreme court bridges v. wixon, 323 u.s. 708 (1945) 323 u.s. 708 harry bridges, petitioner, v. i. f. wixon, as district director, immigration and naturalization service, etc. no. 788. supreme court of the united states january 29, 1945 messrs. lee pressman, richard gladstein, henry cohen, and mrs. carol king, for petitioner. solicitor general fahy, assistant attorney general tom c. clark, and messrs. chester t. lane, robert s. erdahl, and leon ulman, for respondent. petition for writ of certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the ninth circuit. granted. the motion of the communist political association for leave to intervene is denied. mr. justice jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.

Full Judgment

BRIDGES v. WIXON - 323 U.S. 708 (1945)
U.S. Supreme Court BRIDGES v. WIXON, 323 U.S. 708 (1945)

323 U.S. 708

Harry BRIDGES, petitioner,
v.
I. F. WIXON, as District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, etc.
No. 788.

Supreme Court of the United States

January 29, 1945

Messrs. Lee Pressman, Richard Gladstein, Henry Cohen, and Mrs. Carol King, for petitioner.

Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, and Messrs. Chester T. Lane, Robert S. Erdahl, and Leon Ulman, for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Granted.

The motion of the Communist Political Association for leave to intervene is denied.

Mr. Justice JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.

Same Parties Bridges vs Wixon Same Subject Land Acquisition

Land Acquisition Writ of certiorari solicitor general attorney general court of appeals circuit court