Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sunita Devi Vs. the State of Bihar

Sunita Devi vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 23, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975883

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sunita Devi

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.1849 of 2012 ====================================================== sunita devi .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh oral order (per: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh”23. 01-2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioner, informant and the state. the petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered under sections 447, 341, 323, 325, 307, 320 and 504/34 of the indian penal code. the specific accusation of assaulting by bamboo on the head of the deceased is against ranjeet kumar. the postmortem report reflects only one injury. it is alleged against the petitioner and others that they assaulted the interveners. it is submitted that no injury report is on record with regard to the others. considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of rs. patna high court cr.misc. no.1849 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 2/2 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, madhubani in connection with khajauli p.s. case no. 72/2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. (dinesh kumar singh, j.) amrendra

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1849 of 2012 ====================================================== Sunita Devi .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH”

23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, informant and the State. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered under Sections 447, 341, 323, 325, 307, 320 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The specific accusation of assaulting by bamboo on the head of the deceased is against Ranjeet Kumar. The postmortem report reflects only one injury. It is alleged against the petitioner and others that they assaulted the interveners. It is submitted that no injury report is on record with regard to the others. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1849 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 2/2 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Khajauli P.S. Case No. 72/2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) Amrendra

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial