Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ashif Ali Vs. the State of Bihar

Ashif Ali vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 23, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975869

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ashif Ali

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

patna high court cr.misc. no.34472 of 2011 (4) dt.23-01-2012 in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.34472 of 2011 ====================================================== ashif ali, s/o-md. hasid .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s ====================================================== ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice hemant kumar srivastava oral order (per: honourable mr. justice hemant kumar srivastava”23. 01-2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned additional public prosecutor for the state assisted by learned counsel for the informant. petitioner is named in the first information report and there is specific allegation against this petitioner that he inflicted sword blow to the deceased, nurul hoda. the post-mortem report of the deceased corroborates the allegation but submission on behalf of the petitioner is that there was free fight between the parties and persons from both the sides sustained injuries and unfortunately, two persons of the prosecution side died in the alleged occurrence. learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant pointed out that prayer for bail of co-accused anaitullah @ sonu, against whom there is allegation of killing of another deceased, has already been rejected by another bench of this patna high court cr.misc. no.34472 of 2011 (4) dt.23-01-2012 court. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, i am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with taraiya p.s. case no. 91 of 2010 pending in the court of chief judicial magistrate, chapra is, hereby, rejected. (hemant kumar srivastava, j.) shahzad

Full Judgment

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34472 of 2011 (4) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.34472 of 2011 ====================================================== Ashif Ali, S/O-Md. Hasid .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA”

23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Petitioner is named in the first information report and there is specific allegation against this petitioner that he inflicted sword blow to the deceased, Nurul Hoda. The post-mortem report of the deceased corroborates the allegation but submission on behalf of the petitioner is that there was free fight between the parties and persons from both the sides sustained injuries and unfortunately, two persons of the prosecution side died in the alleged occurrence. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant pointed out that prayer for bail of co-accused Anaitullah @ Sonu, against whom there is allegation of killing of another deceased, has already been rejected by another Bench of this Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34472 of 2011 (4) dt.23-01-2012 Court. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with Taraiya P.S. Case No. 91 of 2010 pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chapra is, hereby, rejected. (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.) SHAHZAD

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial