Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Nagendra Kumar Vs. State of Bihar

Nagendra Kumar vs State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 23, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975867

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nagendra Kumar

Respondent

State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.32889 of 2009 ====================================================== nagendra kumar son of sri laxmi narayan singh, resident of village- mayapur, p.o.-bhagwanpur, p.s.-katari sarai, district-nalanda. .... .... petitioner versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice rajendra kumar mishra oral order (per: honourable mr. justice rajendra kumar mishra”23. 01-2012 this application under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure is to quash the order dated 07.06.2008, passed in g.r. no. 942 of 2008 arising out of giriyak (katari sarai) p.s. case no. 77 of 2008 by the chief judicial magistrate, nalanda at biharsharif, taking the cognizance of the offence under sections 420 and 379 of the indian penal code and rules 4/40 (i)/26 of bihar minor mineral concession rules, 1972. while the learned counsel appearing on behalf of accused-petitioner made submission that the cognizance order in respect to offence under sections 420 and 379 of the indian penal code is illegal, but prays for withdrawal of this application with liberty to raise the point, raised herein, at patna high court cr.misc. no.32889 of 2009 (2) dt.23-01-2012 2/2 appropriate stage in trial court. prayer is allowed. this application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted to the petitioner. (rajendra kumar mishra, j.) safik/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32889 of 2009 ====================================================== Nagendra Kumar son of Sri Laxmi Narayan Singh, resident of Village- Mayapur, P.O.-Bhagwanpur, P.S.-Katari Sarai, District-Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA”

23. 01-2012 This application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is to quash the order dated 07.06.2008, passed in G.R. No. 942 of 2008 arising out of Giriyak (Katari Sarai) P.S. Case No. 77 of 2008 by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif, taking the cognizance of the offence under Sections 420 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Rules 4/40 (I)/26 of Bihar Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1972. While the learned counsel appearing on behalf of accused-petitioner made submission that the cognizance order in respect to offence under Sections 420 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code is illegal, but prays for withdrawal of this application with liberty to raise the point, raised herein, at Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32889 of 2009 (2) dt.23-01-2012 2/2 appropriate stage in trial Court. Prayer is allowed. This application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted to the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.) Safik/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial