Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Raushan Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar

Raushan Kumar vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 23, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975864

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Raushan Kumar

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.37384 of 2011 ====================================================== raushan kumar, son of yogendra prasad. .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice akhilesh chandra oral order (per: honourable mr. justice akhilesh chandra”23. 01-2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned additional public prosecutor for the state, who is armed with carbon/xerox copy of the case diary up to paragraph 58 dated 22/08/2011. the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with hilsa p.s. case no. 211 of 2011 for the offence punishable under section 379 of the indian penal code, pending in the court of chief judicial magistrate, hilsa. after some arguments, in view of petitioners date of birth being 02/01/1995, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with a liberty to surrender before the court below within a fortnight and seek his remedies before the court below/appropriate forum under 2 patna high court cr.misc. no.37384 of 2011 (3) dt.23-01-2012 2/2 juvenile justice (care & protection of children) act, 2000 which shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced of instant withdrawal. permission is granted. accordingly, this application stands disposed of as withdrawn. as prayed for, let a copy of this order be communicated to the court below through fax at the cost of the petitioner. (akhilesh chandra, j.) praveen-ii/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.37384 of 2011 ====================================================== Raushan Kumar, Son of Yogendra Prasad. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA”

23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with carbon/xerox copy of the case diary up to paragraph 58 dated 22/08/2011. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 211 of 2011 for the offence punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa. After some arguments, in view of petitioners date of birth being 02/01/1995, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with a liberty to surrender before the court below within a fortnight and seek his remedies before the court below/appropriate forum under 2 Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37384 of 2011 (3) dt.23-01-2012 2/2 Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000 which shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced of instant withdrawal. Permission is granted. Accordingly, this application stands disposed of as withdrawn. As prayed for, let a copy of this order be communicated to the court below through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. (Akhilesh Chandra, J.) Praveen-II/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial