Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ramesh Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar

Ramesh Kumar vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 23, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975824

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramesh Kumar

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

.....code and 25(1- b)a, 26, 35 of the arms act, is one of the named accused in this case of recovery of one motorcycle and cellular phone etc. submission is that the bike recovered is purchased property of the petitioner from one durga singh the original owner. as it appears earlier vide order dated 28.01.2011, a report was called for from the district transport officer, patna, which could not be received till date. however, it is also being submitted now that official transfer of the name of the petitioner as regard to the vehicle involved has already been done on due scrutiny/inquiry. if, it is so, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of rs. 10,000/- patna high court cr.misc. no.36115 of 2010 (4) dt.23-01-2012 (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of chief judicial magistrate, rohtas, in connection with sasaram (model) p.s. case no. 462/2010, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the code of criminal procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly till disposal of the case, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (akhilesh chandra, j) rajeev/-

Full Judgment

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36115 of 2010 (4) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36115 of 2010 ================================================== Ramesh Kumar, son of Nanhak Paswan .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA”

23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Sasaram (Model) P.S. Case No. 462/2010 for the offences under Sections 398, 414, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 25(1- b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act, is one of the named accused in this case of recovery of one motorcycle and cellular phone etc. Submission is that the bike recovered is purchased property of the petitioner from one Durga Singh the original owner. As it appears earlier vide order dated 28.01.2011, a report was called for from the District Transport Officer, Patna, which could not be received till date. However, it is also being submitted now that official transfer of the name of the petitioner as regard to the vehicle involved has already been done on due scrutiny/inquiry. If, it is so, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36115 of 2010 (4) dt.23-01-2012 (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas, in connection with Sasaram (Model) P.S. Case No. 462/2010, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court regularly till disposal of the case, in the event of failure on two consecutive dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. (Akhilesh Chandra, J) Rajeev/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial