Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Lal Babu Vs. the State of Bihar

Lal Babu vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 23, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975813

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lal Babu

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

patna high court cr.misc. no.1083 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.1083 of 2012 ====================================================== lal babu mahto .... .... petitioner. versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party. ====================================================== appearance : coram: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh oral order (per: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh”23. 01-2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the state. the petitioner is languishing in custody since 23.09.2011 in a case registered for the offence under sections 376 and 504 of the indian penal code. the accusation was ventilated through complaint where it is alleged that husband of the complainant upendra rai deserted her hence, she fell love in with this petitioner who established physical relationship on promise of marriage but subsequently he refused to marry. it is submitted that for occurrence of 2007 the complaint was filed in 2011 whereas in 2009 the complainant filed another complaint case no. 1100 of 2009 describing herself as wife of upendra rai where accusation under sections 376/511 of the i.p.c. was levelled against the patna high court cr.misc. no.1083 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 petitioner, the petitioners wife and his brother- in-law (sala). considering delayed lodging of the complaint and inconsistent accusation levelled by the informant, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ist additional sessions judge, samastipur, district-samastipur in connection with s.t. no. 573 of 2011 arising out of warishnagar (mathurapur o.p.)p.s. case no. 184 of 2011. (dinesh kumar singh, j.) u.k./-

Full Judgment

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1083 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1083 of 2012 ====================================================== Lal Babu Mahto .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== Appearance : CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH”

23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 23.09.2011 in a case registered for the offence under Sections 376 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation was ventilated through complaint where it is alleged that husband of the complainant Upendra Rai deserted her hence, she fell love in with this petitioner who established physical relationship on promise of marriage but subsequently he refused to marry. It is submitted that for occurrence of 2007 the complaint was filed in 2011 whereas in 2009 the complainant filed another complaint case no. 1100 of 2009 describing herself as wife of Upendra Rai where accusation under Sections 376/511 of the I.P.C. was levelled against the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1083 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 petitioner, the petitioners wife and his brother- in-law (Sala). Considering delayed lodging of the complaint and inconsistent accusation levelled by the informant, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Samastipur, District-Samastipur in connection with S.T. No. 573 of 2011 arising out of Warishnagar (Mathurapur O.P.)P.S. Case No. 184 of 2011. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) U.K./-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial