Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Amit Kumar @ Dhipha Vs. the State of Bihar

Amit Kumar @ Dhipha vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 23, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975798

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Amit Kumar @ Dhipha

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.3427 of 2012 amit kumar @ dhipha versus the state of bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 23/01/2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner. state is none presented. meena devi filed a written report disclosing therein that his son, bijo paswan who was an addict and on account thereof was not carrying good mental condition was missing since 26.7.2011. subsequently, chaukidar had informed that he is lying in unconscious condition. she rushed to p.o. and found her son dead. she had not shown any kind of suspicion against anybody. admittedly, petitioner is not named. from the learned lower court record, it is evident that witnesses have come forward to support the case of last seen theory. however, close proximity of time in between is missing. in the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners amit kumar @ dhipha is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction 2 of chief judicial magistrate, begusarai in connection with sadar (mufassil) p.s. case no. 231/2011. (aditya kumar trivedi,j.) perwez

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3427 of 2012 Amit Kumar @ Dhipha Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 23/01/2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. State is none presented. Meena Devi filed a written report disclosing therein that his son, Bijo Paswan who was an addict and on account thereof was not carrying good mental condition was missing since 26.7.2011. Subsequently, Chaukidar had informed that he is lying in unconscious condition. She rushed to P.O. and found her son dead. She had not shown any kind of suspicion against anybody. Admittedly, petitioner is not named. From the learned lower court record, it is evident that witnesses have come forward to support the case of last seen theory. However, close proximity of time in between is missing. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners Amit Kumar @ Dhipha is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction 2 of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Sadar (Mufassil) P.S. Case No. 231/2011. (Aditya Kumar Trivedi,J.) perwez

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial