Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Manoj Yadav @ Munna Yadav @ Manoj Kumar Yadav Vs. the State of Bihar

Manoj Yadav @ Munna Yadav @ Manoj Kumar Yadav vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 23, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975795

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manoj Yadav @ Munna Yadav @ Manoj Kumar Yadav

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.38736 of 2011 manoj yadav @ munna yadav @ manoj kumar yadav versus the state of bihar with criminal miscellaneous no.39282 of 2011 sanny @ sanny kumar @ sani raj @ sani mandal versus the state of bihar ---------------------------------”23. 01-2012 both the above-said cr. misc. cases arise out of k.hat (maranga) p.s. case no. 362 of 2011 and accordingly, the above-said cr. misc. cases are being disposed of by this common order. heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned additional public prosecutor for the state assisted by learned counsel for the informant. petitioner in cr.misc. no. 38736 of 2011 is named whereas; petitioner in cr. misc. no. 39282 of 2011 is not named and his name surfaced in course of investigation on the ground that he was last seen with the deceased. it would appear from perusal of the case diary as well as submission of the parties that except confessional statement of co-accused, there is nothing against both the petitioners. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, the petitioners, namely, manoj yadav @ munna yadav @ manoj kumar yadav (in cr. misc. no. 38736 of 2011) and sanny @ sanny kumar @ sani raj @ sani mandal (in cr. misc. no. 39282 of 2011) are -2- directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with k.hat (maranga) p.s. case no. 362 of 2011 to the satisfaction of chief judicial magistrate, purnea. akv/- (hemant kumar srivastava,j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38736 of 2011 Manoj Yadav @ Munna Yadav @ Manoj Kumar Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar with Criminal Miscellaneous No.39282 of 2011 Sanny @ Sanny Kumar @ Sani Raj @ Sani Mandal Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------”

23. 01-2012 Both the above-said Cr. Misc. Cases arise out of K.Hat (Maranga) P.S. case No. 362 of 2011 and accordingly, the above-said Cr. Misc. Cases are being disposed of by this common order. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Petitioner in Cr.Misc. No. 38736 of 2011 is named whereas; petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 39282 of 2011 is not named and his name surfaced in course of investigation on the ground that he was last seen with the deceased. It would appear from perusal of the case diary as well as submission of the parties that except confessional statement of co-accused, there is nothing against both the petitioners. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, the petitioners, namely, Manoj Yadav @ Munna Yadav @ Manoj Kumar Yadav (in Cr. Misc. No. 38736 of 2011) and Sanny @ Sanny Kumar @ Sani Raj @ Sani Mandal (in Cr. Misc. No. 39282 of 2011) are -2- directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with K.Hat (Maranga) P.S. case No. 362 of 2011 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea. AKV/- (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial