Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kaushlendra Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar

Kaushlendra Kumar vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 23, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975756

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kaushlendra Kumar

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

patna high court cr.misc. no.1924 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.1924 of 2012 ====================================================== kaushlendra kumar .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh oral order (per: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh”23. 01-2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the state. the petitioner being the secretary of bihar gramin jagrukta abhiyan samitee is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under sections 409 and 420 of the indian penal code. it is alleged that during inspection it was found that attendance register showed presence of ten women when only two women were found present and name of six women were wiped out from the records by applying whitener. it is further alleged that seven employees were shown in the attendance register to be present but only one employee was present at the time of inspection, the cook was also absent. it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the investigation is still going on and the misappropriation of the fund is not alleged against the petitioner as he is not patna high court cr.misc. no.1924 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 authorized to disburse the amount. considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, begusarai in connection with begusarai town p.s. case no. 17/2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. (dinesh kumar singh, j.) amrendra/-

Full Judgment

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1924 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1924 of 2012 ====================================================== Kaushlendra Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH”

23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner being the Secretary of Bihar Gramin Jagrukta Abhiyan Samitee is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that during inspection it was found that attendance register showed presence of ten women when only two women were found present and name of six women were wiped out from the records by applying whitener. It is further alleged that seven employees were shown in the attendance register to be present but only one employee was present at the time of inspection, the cook was also absent. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the investigation is still going on and the misappropriation of the fund is not alleged against the petitioner as he is not Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1924 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 authorized to disburse the amount. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Begusarai Town P.S. Case No. 17/2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) Amrendra/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial