Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Basant Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar

Basant Kumar vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 23, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975660

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Basant Kumar

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.1855 of 2012 ====================================================== basant kumar .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh oral order (per: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh”23. 01-2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the state. the petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under section 498a/34 of the indian penal code and section 3/4 of the dowry prohibition act. the accusation is of demand of dowry and torture. it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the divorce case was filed by the petitioner on 02.06.2011 and thereafter the present case was lodged on 11.07.2011. considering the lodging of the divorce case at the earlier point of time, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount patna high court cr.misc. no.1855 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 2/2 each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, vaishali in connection with mahua p.s. case no. 286/2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. (dinesh kumar singh, j.) amrendra

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1855 of 2012 ====================================================== Basant Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH”

23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The accusation is of demand of dowry and torture. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the divorce case was filed by the petitioner on 02.06.2011 and thereafter the present case was lodged on 11.07.2011. Considering the lodging of the divorce case at the earlier point of time, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1855 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 2/2 each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 286/2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) Amrendra

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial