Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ajit Bhagat Vs. the State of Bihar

Ajit Bhagat vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 23, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975653

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ajit Bhagat

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

patna high court cr.misc. no.69 of 2011 (2) dt.23-01-2012 in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.69 of 2011 ====================================================== ajit bhagat .... .... petitioner versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party ====================================================== appearance : for the petitioner : mr. brij nandan prasad, advocate. for the opposite party/s : mr. zainul abedin, a.p.p. ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice shivaji pandey oral order (per: honourable mr. justice shivaji pandey”23. 01-2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the state. this application has been filed for quashing the order dated 3.11.2010 passed by the judicial magistrate, ist class, banka in g.r. no.1015, corresponding to amarpur p.s. case no.153 of 2008 by which the learned magistrate has been pleased to reject the petition under section 239 of the code of criminal procedure of the petitioner for discharge under section 47(a) of the excise act. according to the first information report it appears that recovery was made from the house of one ram yadav. he has shown the photocopy of the licence and on that basis the present case has been lodged. the claim of the petitioner is that no case is made out against him as he has patna high court cr.misc. no.69 of 2011 (2) dt.23-01-2012 not violated any provision of the excise act. call for the carbon copy of the case diary in connection with amarpur p.s. case no. 153 of 2008, g.r. no.1015 of 2008 pending in the court of the judicial magistrate, ist class, banka. in the meantime, further proceedings in amarpur p.s. case no. 153 of 2008, g.r. no.1015 of 2008 pending in the court of the judicial magistrate, ist class, banka shall remain stayed. (shivaji pandey, j.) vinay/-

Full Judgment

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.69 of 2011 (2) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.69 of 2011 ====================================================== Ajit Bhagat .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Brij Nandan Prasad, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Zainul Abedin, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY”

23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 3.11.2010 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Banka in G.R. No.1015, corresponding to Amarpur P.S. Case no.153 of 2008 by which the learned Magistrate has been pleased to reject the petition under Section 239 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the petitioner for discharge under section 47(A) of the Excise Act. According to the First Information Report it appears that recovery was made from the house of one Ram Yadav. He has shown the photocopy of the licence and on that basis the present case has been lodged. The claim of the petitioner is that no case is made out against him as he has Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.69 of 2011 (2) dt.23-01-2012 not violated any provision of the Excise Act. Call for the carbon copy of the case diary in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No. 153 of 2008, G.R. No.1015 of 2008 pending in the court of the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Banka. In the meantime, further proceedings in Amarpur P.S. Case No. 153 of 2008, G.R. No.1015 of 2008 pending in the court of the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Banka shall remain stayed. (Shivaji Pandey, J.) Vinay/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial