Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Arun Sah Vs. the State of Bihar

Arun Sah vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 23, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975635

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Arun Sah

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.2087 of 2012 ====================================================== arun sah .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh oral order (per: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh”23. 01-2012 petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences under sections 419, 420, 409, 467, 468, 471/34 of the i.p.c. accusation is of committing irregularities in executing the scheme under manrega. the specific accusation is of using jcb machine instead of using manual labour and conducting work at different place than the required place. petitioner was one of the executing agent. it appears that after enquiry the f.i.r. was lodged and in the enquiry, nothing was alleged against the petitioner, hence petitioner was not named in the f.i.r. it is further submitted that others have been granted anticipatory bail and the investigation is still pending against the petitioner. considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner namely arun sah, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, munger in connection with dharhara p.s. case no. 87 of 2010. the bail bond of the petitioner will be accepted by learned court below on affidavit being filed that he will cooperate in the investigation. let the said affidavit be send to i.o. by learned court below. (dinesh kumar singh, j) shageer/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2087 of 2012 ====================================================== Arun Sah .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH”

23. 01-2012 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences under Sections 419, 420, 409, 467, 468, 471/34 of the I.P.C. Accusation is of committing irregularities in executing the scheme under MANREGA. The specific accusation is of using JCB machine instead of using manual labour and conducting work at different place than the required place. Petitioner was one of the executing agent. It appears that after enquiry the F.I.R. was lodged and in the enquiry, nothing was alleged against the petitioner, hence petitioner was not named in the F.I.R. It is further submitted that others have been granted anticipatory bail and the investigation is still pending against the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner namely Arun Sah, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Dharhara P.S. Case No. 87 of 2010. The bail bond of the petitioner will be accepted by learned Court below on affidavit being filed that he will cooperate in the investigation. Let the said affidavit be send to I.O. by learned Court below. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) SHAGEER/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial