Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ambika Prasad Vs. the State of Bihar

Ambika Prasad vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 23, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975634

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ambika Prasad

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

patna high court cr.misc. no.40422 of 2011 (3) dt.23-01-2012 in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.40422 of 2011 ====================================================== ambika prasad .... .... petitioner versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party appearance : for the petitioner : mr. manoj kumar for the opposite party : mr. md fahimuddin =====================================================”23. 01-2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned addl. public prosecutor for the state. petitioner is in jail custody since 14.9.2011 in a case registered under sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 504 of the ipc. admittedly, the aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of complaint petition. learned counsel for the petitioner drew my attention towards this fact that petitioner had already given a notice to the informant for execution of titima deed and, as a matter of fact, petitioner had purchased land in question from one sumitra devi who stood guarantor in loan transaction of one prabodh kumar dubey against whom ara town p.s. case no. 330/2009 has been registered. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, ambika prasad, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the chief judicial magistrate, bhojpur at ara in ara nawada p.s. case no. 340/2011. (hemant kumar srivastava, j) shahid hassan/-

Full Judgment

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40422 of 2011 (3) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.40422 of 2011 ====================================================== Ambika Prasad .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party : Mr. Md Fahimuddin =====================================================”

23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 14.9.2011 in a case registered under sections 406, 420, 467, 468 and 504 of the IPC. Admittedly, the aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of complaint petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner drew my attention towards this fact that petitioner had already given a notice to the informant for execution of Titima deed and, as a matter of fact, petitioner had purchased land in question from one Sumitra Devi who stood guarantor in loan transaction of one Prabodh Kumar Dubey against whom Ara Town P.S. Case no. 330/2009 has been registered. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, Ambika Prasad, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in Ara Nawada P.S. Case no. 340/2011. (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) Shahid Hassan/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial