Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Renu Devi and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar

Renu Devi and ors. vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 23, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975633

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Renu Devi and ors.

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.1822 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. renu devi 2. mantu bharati @ matu kumar bharati 3. urmila devi. .... .... petitioners versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh oral order (per: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh”23. 01-2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioners, informant and the state. the petitioners being the sister, brother-in-law and the mother of the husband are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under sections 326, 307, 498a and 379 of the indian penal code. it is alleged that all the accused persons in collusion and conspiracy burnt the informant when she was taken to p.m.c.h. for treatment. it is also alleged that from the hospital the victim was taken to her parents house by her father but from the f.i.r. it appears that treatment was being done at the behest of the in-laws family. it appears that earlier also with the same accusation, the case was lodged in which the petitioners were granted bail. it is submitted that the for the occurrence of 26.10.2010 the f.i.r. was lodged on 28.05.2011 considering the inordinate delay in lodging the f.i.r. which clouds the bona fide of the accusation, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, chapra in connection with dariyapur p.s. case no. 95/2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. (dinesh kumar singh, j.) amrendra/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1822 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Renu Devi 2. Mantu Bharati @ Matu Kumar Bharati 3. Urmila Devi. .... .... Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH”

23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners, informant and the State. The petitioners being the sister, brother-in-law and the mother of the husband are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 326, 307, 498A and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that all the accused persons in collusion and conspiracy burnt the informant when she was taken to P.M.C.H. for treatment. It is also alleged that from the hospital the victim was taken to her parents house by her father but from the F.I.R. it appears that treatment was being done at the behest of the in-laws family. It appears that earlier also with the same accusation, the case was lodged in which the petitioners were granted bail. It is submitted that the for the occurrence of 26.10.2010 the F.I.R. was lodged on 28.05.2011 Considering the inordinate delay in lodging the F.I.R. which clouds the bona fide of the accusation, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chapra in connection with Dariyapur P.S. Case No. 95/2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) Amrendra/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial