Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Raju Kumar Gupta Vs. the State of Bihar Through C.B

Raju Kumar Gupta vs The State of Bihar Through C.B

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 25, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975625

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Raju Kumar Gupta

Advocate Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur

Respondent

The State of Bihar Through C.B

Excerpt

patna high court cr.misc. no.2564 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.2564 of 2012 ====================================================== raju kumar gupta .... .... petitioner. versus the state of bihar through c.b.i. .... .... opposite party. ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh oral order (per: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh”25. 01-2012 heard mr. ajay kumar thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and mr. bipin kumar, learned counsel for the c.b.i. this is third attempt on behalf of petitioner for getting the anticipatory bail in a case registered for the offence under sections 120b, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the indian penal code and section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the prevention of corruption act. the accusation was of preparing fake and fabricated bills by forging the signature of competent authority against supply of the materials for which no order was passed by b.s.n.l. it is submitted that others have been granted anticipatory bail in the matter on depositing of the alleged amount against them. this court is not inclined to consider patna high court cr.misc. no.2564 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 anticipatory bail of petitioner. however, let the learned court below consider regular bail of petitioner considering the fact that others have been granted bail on depositing of the alleged amount against them. with this observation, this anticipatory bail application in connection with special case no. 18/05 arising out of r.c. case no. 15(a)/05 pending in the court of the learned special judge, c.b.i.,iii, patna, is disposed off. let the order be faxed to the learned court below at the cost of petitioner. (dinesh kumar singh, j.) u.k./-

Full Judgment

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2564 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2564 of 2012 ====================================================== Raju Kumar Gupta .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar Through C.B.I. .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH”

25. 01-2012 Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Bipin Kumar, learned counsel for the C.B.I. This is third attempt on behalf of petitioner for getting the anticipatory bail in a case registered for the offence under Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The accusation was of preparing fake and fabricated bills by forging the signature of competent authority against supply of the materials for which no order was passed by B.S.N.L. It is submitted that others have been granted anticipatory bail in the matter on depositing of the alleged amount against them. This Court is not inclined to consider Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2564 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 anticipatory bail of petitioner. However, let the learned court below consider regular bail of petitioner considering the fact that others have been granted bail on depositing of the alleged amount against them. With this observation, this anticipatory bail application in connection with Special Case No. 18/05 arising out of R.C. Case No. 15(A)/05 pending in the court of the learned Special Judge, C.B.I.,III, Patna, is disposed off. Let the order be faxed to the learned court below at the cost of petitioner. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) U.K./-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial