Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Haider Mian Vs. the State of Bihar

Haider Mian vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 25, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975595

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Haider Mian

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

patna high court cr.misc. no.1517 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.1517 of 2012 ====================================================== haider mian, son of master md. salam @ abdus salam .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s ====================================================== appearance : for the petitioner/s : mr. lakshmikant sharma, advocate for the opposite party/s : mr. amrendra kr. sinha, a.p.p. ====================================================== coram: honourable justice smt. anjana prakash oral order (per: honourable justice smt. anjana prakash) 2. 25.1.2012 this application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for modifying the order dated 22.11.2011. heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the state. the petitioner was allowed anticipatory bail by an order dated 22.11.2011 passed in cr.misc.no.36188 of 2011 but an affidavit was to be filed on his behalf that he has no criminal antecedents. since there were four cases pending against the petitioner, which was not known to the father-in- law of co-petitioner, who had sworn the affidavit, such an affidavit was filed before this court. he did not intend to mislead the court. moreover the submission is that the cases are of minor nature. however, considering that this court on consideration that the petitioner had no criminal antecedents had granted him anticipatory bail, i am not inclined to modify patna high court cr.misc. no.1517 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 the earlier order. the application is disposed of with a direction to the court below to consider that the petitioner had been granted anticipatory bail by this court, when he surrenders and makes prayer for regular bail. narendra/ ( anjana prakash, j.)

Full Judgment

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1517 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1517 of 2012 ====================================================== Haider Mian, son of Master Md. Salam @ Abdus Salam .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lakshmikant Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amrendra Kr. Sinha, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH) 2. 25.1.2012 This application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for modifying the order dated 22.11.2011. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was allowed anticipatory bail by an order dated 22.11.2011 passed in Cr.Misc.No.36188 of 2011 but an affidavit was to be filed on his behalf that he has no criminal antecedents. Since there were four cases pending against the petitioner, which was not known to the father-in- law of co-petitioner, who had sworn the affidavit, such an affidavit was filed before this Court. He did not intend to mislead the court. Moreover the submission is that the cases are of minor nature. However, considering that this Court on consideration that the petitioner had no criminal antecedents had granted him anticipatory bail, I am not inclined to modify Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1517 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 the earlier order. The application is disposed of with a direction to the court below to consider that the petitioner had been granted anticipatory bail by this court, when he surrenders and makes prayer for regular bail. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J.

)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial