Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hira Ram Vs. the State of Bihar

Hira Ram vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 25, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975586

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hira Ram

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.2243 of 2012 ====================================================== hira ram .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh oral order (per: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh”25. 01-2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the state. the petitioner being the brother of the father-in-law of the informant is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under sections 341, 323, 504, 354, 379 and 307/34 of the indian penal code. the accusations of the offences under sections 354 and 379 of the ipc are specific against pradip ram and there is general accusation against other accused persons including the petitioner when the injuries have been found to be simple. the occurrence took place in the background of some land dispute between the parties. considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named 2 patna high court cr.misc. no.2243 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 2/2 petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, siwan in connection with jame bazar p.s. case no. 60 of 2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr. p.c. (dinesh kumar singh, j.) amrendra/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2243 of 2012 ====================================================== Hira Ram .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH”

25. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the brother of the father-in-law of the informant is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 504, 354, 379 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusations of the offences under Sections 354 and 379 of the IPC are specific against Pradip Ram and there is general accusation against other accused persons including the petitioner when the injuries have been found to be simple. The occurrence took place in the background of some land dispute between the parties. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named 2 Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2243 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 2/2 petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan In connection with Jame Bazar P.S. Case No. 60 of 2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) Amrendra/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial