Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Holley Vs. Lawrence

Holley vs Lawrence

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jan-18-1943
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/97555

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
317 U.S. 518
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Holley

Respondent

Lawrence

Excerpt

holley v. lawrence - 317 u.s. 518 (1943) u.s. supreme court holley v. lawrence, 317 u.s. 518 (1943) holley v. lawrence no. 600 decided january 18, 1943 317 u.s. 518 appeal from the supreme court of georgia syllabus the decision of the state court that failure to offer the testimony of a wife at the trial of her husband barred a later claim of the unconstitutionality of a state statute making such testimony incompetent held a nonfederal ground adequate to support the judgment. appeal dismissed. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. the court has examined all the federal questions raised by appellant. insofar as the appeal challenges the validity of georgia code § 38-1604, which makes incompetent the testimony of a wife at the trial of her husband, the judgment of the court below rests upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it -- namely that the failure to tender such testimony at the trial barred any later claim of the alleged constitutional right. atlantic coast line r. co. v. mims, 242 u. s. 532 , 242 u. s. 535 . the court finds that no other federal question presented by the appeal warrants review by this court. the appeal is accordingly dismissed. dismissed.

Full Judgment

Holley v. Lawrence - 317 U.S. 518 (1943)
U.S. Supreme Court Holley v. Lawrence, 317 U.S. 518 (1943)

Holley v. Lawrence

No. 600

Decided January 18, 1943

317 U.S. 518

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA

SYLLABUS

The decision of the state court that failure to offer the testimony of a wife at the trial of her husband barred a later claim of the unconstitutionality of a state statute making such testimony incompetent held a nonfederal ground adequate to support the judgment.

Appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The Court has examined all the federal questions raised by appellant. Insofar as the appeal challenges the validity of Georgia Code § 38-1604, which makes incompetent the testimony of a wife at the trial of her husband, the judgment of the court below rests upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it -- namely that the failure to tender such testimony at the trial barred any later claim of the alleged constitutional right. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Mims, 242 U. S. 532 , 242 U. S. 535 . The Court finds that no other federal question presented by the appeal warrants review by this Court. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial