Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mangali Devi and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar

Mangali Devi and ors. vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 25, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975521

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mangali Devi and ors.

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.2375 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. mangali devi 2. kameshwar rishideo.3. ramsharan rishideo @ ramehen .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s ====================================================== appearance : for the petitioner/s : mr. for the opposite party/s : mr. ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh oral order (per: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh”25. 01-2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the state. the petitioners being the wife and brothers of the wife of the deceased are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under section 304/34 of the indian penal code. the accusation is of making assault to the deceased by all the in-laws including the wife. the postmortem report reflects no external injury 2 patna high court cr.misc. no.2375 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 2/2 and considering the same other accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail vide cr. misc. no. 25191 of 2011. considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, madhepura in connection with murliganj (arar) p.s. case no. 42 of 2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr. p.c. (dinesh kumar singh, j.) amrendra/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2375 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Mangali Devi 2. Kameshwar Rishideo.

3. Ramsharan Rishideo @ Ramehen .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH”

25. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioners being the wife and brothers of the wife of the deceased are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 304/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of making assault to the deceased by all the in-laws including the wife. The postmortem report reflects no external injury 2 Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2375 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 2/2 and considering the same other accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 25191 of 2011. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura In connection with Murliganj (Arar) P.S. Case No. 42 of 2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) Amrendra/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial