Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Babu Vs. the State of Bihar

Babu vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 25, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975517

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Babu

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

patna high court cr.misc. no.273 of 2011 (2) dt.25-01-2012 in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.273 of 2011 ====================================================== babu, son of samsul haque, resident of village-panjipara, police station- gopalpokhar, district-uttar dinajpur (west bengal) .... .... petitioner versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party ====================================================== appearance : for the petitioner/s : mr. vikram deo singh, advocate. for the opposite party/s : mr. md. hussain, a.p.p. ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice shivaji pandey oral order (per: honourable mr. justice shivaji pandey”25. 01-2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the state. this application has been filed for quashing the order dated 3.2.2010 passed in kishanganj p.s. case no.185 of 2008 by the chief judicial magistrate, kishanganj by which the learned magistrate has taken cognizance against the petitioner under sections 414, 419/34 of the indian penal code and 11(1)(d) of the prevention of cruelty to animal act. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the police has intercepted a truck bearing registration no. br- 06-d/3123 having 17 heads of bullocks coming from dalkola and going towards islampur and on enquiry the patna high court cr.misc. no.273 of 2011 (2) dt.25-01-2012 police seized 17 heads of cattle. he has further submitted that on asking for documents with regard to purchase of cattle the petitioner could not produce any document and a seizure list was prepared. the petitioner claims that the cattle were purchased by him. at this stage this court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. this application is dismissed with a liberty to raise all the points before the trial court at the appropriate stage. (shivaji pandey, j.) vinay/-

Full Judgment

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.273 of 2011 (2) dt.25-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.273 of 2011 ====================================================== Babu, son of Samsul Haque, resident of Village-Panjipara, Police Station- Gopalpokhar, District-Uttar Dinajpur (West Bengal) .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vikram Deo Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Hussain, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY”

25. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 3.2.2010 passed in Kishanganj P.S. Case No.185 of 2008 by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj by which the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance against the petitioner under sections 414, 419/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 11(1)(d) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the police has intercepted a truck bearing registration no. BR- 06-D/3123 having 17 heads of bullocks coming from Dalkola and going towards Islampur and on enquiry the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.273 of 2011 (2) dt.25-01-2012 police seized 17 heads of cattle. He has further submitted that on asking for documents with regard to purchase of cattle the petitioner could not produce any document and a seizure list was prepared. The petitioner claims that the cattle were purchased by him. At this stage this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. This application is dismissed with a liberty to raise all the points before the trial court at the appropriate stage. (Shivaji Pandey, J.) Vinay/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial