Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hari Nandan Singh Vs. the State of Bihar

Hari Nandan Singh vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 25, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975483

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hari Nandan Singh

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

.....302/34 of the indian penal code. there is allegation that anil singh, ranjit singh, pappu singh and harinandan singh and manoj singh dragged mahesh kumar, the son of the informant and killed him by garasa. the motive of the occurrence is that illicit relation of the daughter of anil singh with mahesh kumar, son of the informant who is running a coaching centre. however, allegation against the petitioner is omnibus and there is no specific allegation and no specific role attributed to him. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the patna high court cr.misc. no.2975 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 petitioner is witness in a rape case and on similarly situated case one co-accused has been granted bail by this court in cr. misc. no. 44883 of 2011, though, in the said order of granting bail, honble court has granted bail to the petitioner on the ground that he is suffering from kidney failure. having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of shri deopriya kumar, judicial magistrate ist class, khagaria, in connection with khagaria (muffasil) p.s. case no. 300 of 2011, g.r. no. 1131 of 2011. (gopal prasad, j.) m.p.

Full Judgment

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2975 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2975 of 2012 ====================================================== Hari Nandan Singh, son of Late Ganga Charan Singh, resident of Village- Bhadas, P.S. (Muffasil) Khagaria, in the District of Khagaria. .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. For the petitioner :- Mr. Braj Nandan Kr. Tiwary, Advocate. For the State :- Mr. A. M.P. Mehta, A.P.P. CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD”

25. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with Khagaria (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 300 of 2011, registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. There is allegation that Anil Singh, Ranjit Singh, Pappu Singh and Harinandan Singh and Manoj Singh dragged Mahesh Kumar, the son of the informant and killed him by Garasa. The motive of the occurrence is that illicit relation of the daughter of Anil Singh with Mahesh Kumar, son of the informant who is running a coaching centre. However, allegation against the petitioner is omnibus and there is no specific allegation and no specific role attributed to him. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2975 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 petitioner is witness in a rape case and on similarly situated case one co-accused has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 44883 of 2011, though, in the said order of granting bail, Honble Court has granted bail to the petitioner on the ground that he is suffering from kidney failure. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri Deopriya Kumar, Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Khagaria, in connection with Khagaria (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 300 of 2011, G.R. No. 1131 of 2011. (Gopal Prasad, J.) m.p.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial