Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sushila Devi and ors Vs. State of Bihar and anr

Sushila Devi and ors vs State of Bihar and anr

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 19, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975474

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sushila Devi and ors

Respondent

State of Bihar and anr

Excerpt

patna high court cr.misc. no.13698 of 2010 (7) dt.19-01-2012 in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.13698 of 2010 ====================================================== sushila devi & ors .... .... petitioners versus state of bihar & anr .... .... opposite parties ====================================================== appearance : for the petitioners: mr. ravi ranjan-1 for the opposite parties: mr. ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice vikash jain oral order (per: honourable mr. justice vikash jain”19. 01-2012 it is noted from the letter dated 12.12.2011 of the ministry of home affairs, government of india that the government of nepal is returning all the judicial processes issued by various courts in india expressing its inability to execute the same. as such no fruitful purpose will be served by requiring issuance of fresh notice in such circumstances. it is also noticed from an earlier order of this court passed on 27.1.2011 that in view of the refusal of the notice to accept service of notice, house service had been effected and notice to o.p.no. 2 was deemed to have been validly served. let the matter therefore, be placed under the heading for admission. chandran (vikash jain, j.)

Full Judgment

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13698 of 2010 (7) dt.19-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.13698 of 2010 ====================================================== Sushila Devi & Ors .... .... Petitioners Versus State Of Bihar & Anr .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners: Mr. Ravi Ranjan-1 For the Opposite Parties: Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN”

19. 01-2012 It is noted from the letter dated 12.12.2011 of the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India that the Government of Nepal is returning all the judicial processes issued by various Courts in India expressing its inability to execute the same. As such no fruitful purpose will be served by requiring issuance of fresh notice in such circumstances. It is also noticed from an earlier order of this Court passed on 27.1.2011 that in view of the refusal of the notice to accept service of notice, house service had been effected and notice to O.P.No. 2 was deemed to have been validly served. Let the matter therefore, be placed under the heading for admission. Chandran (Vikash Jain, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial