Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sahjad Vs. the State of Bihar

Sahjad vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 19, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975467

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sahjad

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

.....heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the state. the petitioners are languishing in custody since 05.08.2011 and 13.12.2010 respectively in a case registered for the offence under sections 20, 21 and 22 of the n. d. p. s. act. for the alleged occurrence, three cases were lodged. first one under sections 399 and 402 of the i.p.c. second under the arms act and third one being the present cases under the n.d.p.s. act. there is recovery of 05 kg. of ganja from hazrat ali. it is alleged that the petitioners fled away from the place of occurrence. it is orally patna high court cr.misc. no.961 of 2012 (2) dt.19-01-2012 submitted on behalf of the petitioner sahjad that he is not involved in any case except the present three cases registered for the same occurrence. it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner samshul bashar @ masoom that he is involved in two other cases in which he is on bail. considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned additional district and sessions judge-i, siwan in connection with n.d. p.s. trial no. 76 of 2011 arising out of badhariya p.s. case no. 157 of 2010. u. k. (dinesh kumar singh, j)

Full Judgment

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.961 of 2012 (2) dt.19-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.961 of 2012 ====================================================== Sahjad .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.1549 of 2012 ====================================================== Samshul Bashar @ Masoom .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH”

19. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are languishing in custody since 05.08.2011 and 13.12.2010 respectively in a case registered for the offence under Sections 20, 21 and 22 of the N. D. P. S. Act. For the alleged occurrence, three cases were lodged. First one under Sections 399 and 402 of the I.P.C. second under the Arms Act and third one being the present cases under the N.D.P.S. Act. There is recovery of 05 Kg. of Ganja from Hazrat Ali. It is alleged that the petitioners fled away from the place of occurrence. It is orally Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.961 of 2012 (2) dt.19-01-2012 submitted on behalf of the petitioner Sahjad that he is not involved in any case except the present three cases registered for the same occurrence. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner Samshul Bashar @ Masoom that he is involved in two other cases in which he is on bail. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-I, Siwan in connection with N.D. P.S. Trial No. 76 of 2011 arising out of Badhariya P.S. Case No. 157 of 2010. U. K. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial