Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Naresh Paswan Vs. the State of Bihar Through the

Naresh Paswan vs The State of Bihar Through the

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 19, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975405

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Naresh Paswan

Respondent

The State of Bihar Through the

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.37496 of 2011 ====================================================== naresh paswan, son of late dhibu paswan, resident of village tekari, p.s. rajaun, district banka; presently residing at chitkohra basti; by the side of masjid, p.s. gardanibagh, district patna. .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar through the vigilance .... .... opposite party/s ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice rakesh kumar oral order (per: honourable mr. justice rakesh kumar”19. 01-2012 on call, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner either to press this petition or to make a prayer for adjournment. in this case was passed over on 17.1.2012. again yesterday, it was passed over on the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. today, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. shri rama kant sharma, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party i.e. vigilance investigation bureau is present. the present petition under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure has been filed for quashing of an order dated 12.9.2011 passed in special case no.36 of patna high court cr.misc. no.37496 of 2011 (3) dt.19-01-201”2008. (arising out of vigilance p.s. case no.48 of 2008). by the said order, the learned special judge has rejected the petition filed for discharge. shri rama kant sharma, learned senior counsel submits that the petitioner was apprehended while taking illegal gratification to the tune of rs.45,000/-. he further submits that there is no ground for interference with the order of rejection of discharge petition. i have perused the impugned order. i do not find any defect in the order. the petition stands dismissed. the court below is required to proceed with the case so that the trial may come to its logical end without un-necessary delay. (rakesh kumar, j) n.h./

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.37496 of 2011 ====================================================== Naresh Paswan, son of Late Dhibu Paswan, resident of village Tekari, P.S. Rajaun, District Banka; Presently residing at Chitkohra Basti; by the side of Masjid, p.S. Gardanibagh, District Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar through the Vigilance .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR”

19. 01-2012 On call, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner either to press this petition or to make a prayer for adjournment. In this case was passed over on 17.1.2012. Again yesterday, it was passed over on the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. Today, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Shri Rama Kant Sharma, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party i.e. Vigilance Investigation Bureau is present. The present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed for quashing of an order dated 12.9.2011 passed in Special Case No.36 of Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37496 of 2011 (3) dt.19-01-201”

2008. (arising out of Vigilance P.S. Case No.48 of 2008). By the said order, the learned Special Judge has rejected the petition filed for discharge. Shri Rama Kant Sharma, learned Senior Counsel submits that the petitioner was apprehended while taking illegal gratification to the tune of Rs.45,000/-. He further submits that there is no ground for interference with the order of rejection of discharge petition. I have perused the impugned order. I do not find any defect in the order. The petition stands dismissed. The court below is required to proceed with the case so that the trial may come to its logical end without un-necessary delay. (Rakesh Kumar, J) N.H./

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial