Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mohar Sah Vs. the State of Bihar

Mohar Sah vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 19, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975404

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mohar Sah

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.2688 of 2012 mohar sah, son of late deodhari sah, resident of village gangati, p.s. ahiyapur, district muzaffarpur .. petitioner versus the state of bihar .. opposite party **** /3/ 19 january, heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the 2012 state. this is an application for grant of anticipatory bail for offence under section 302/34 of the penal code. though there is allegation in the petition that this petitioner was abater and order giver and in consequence one arun sahni and sunil sah assaulted the deceased by lathi. however, the police after investigation submitted charge sheet against arun sahni and rambrikcha sahni, but, submitted final form against mohar sah, sunil sah, shanker sah and babulal sah. the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that co-accused, sunil sah and shanker sah, have been granted bail by this court in cr. misc. no. 34365 of 2011 and the case of the petitioner is on much better footing as the petitioner is only an order giver. hence, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender of the petitioners, he is directed to be released on anticipatory bail, within four weeks, from the date of receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with ahiyapur p.s. case no. 299 of 2007 to the satisfaction of smt. anandita singh, judicial magistrate, 1st class, muzaffarpur, subject to the condition laid down under section 438(2) of the criminal procedure code. ( gopal prasad, j.) s.a.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2688 of 2012 Mohar Sah, son of late Deodhari Sah, resident of village Gangati, P.S. Ahiyapur, district Muzaffarpur .. Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .. Opposite party **** /3/ 19 January, Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the 2012 State. This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail for offence under Section 302/34 of the Penal Code. Though there is allegation in the petition that this petitioner was abater and order giver and in consequence one Arun Sahni and Sunil Sah assaulted the deceased by lathi. However, the police after investigation submitted charge sheet against Arun Sahni and Rambrikcha Sahni, but, submitted final form against Mohar Sah, Sunil Sah, Shanker Sah and Babulal Sah. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that co-accused, Sunil Sah and Shanker Sah, have been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 34365 of 2011 and the case of the petitioner is on much better footing as the petitioner is only an order giver. Hence, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender of the petitioners, he is directed to be released on anticipatory bail, within four weeks, from the date of receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 299 of 2007 to the satisfaction of Smt. Anandita Singh, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. ( Gopal Prasad, J.) S.A.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial