Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Arbind Prasad and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar

Arbind Prasad and ors. vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 19, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975365

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Arbind Prasad and ors.

Advocate Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Sinha

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.1920 o”1. arbind prasad, 2. smt. kamod devi, 3. ravi kumar alias bittu, 4. priya ranjan, 5. simpal kumari, 6. sanju prasad alias sanju kumari, 7. smt. rekha devi, 8. nagendra prasad, 9. smt. anita devi, 10. rakesh kumar alias chhotu versus the state of bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 19.1.2012 heard mr. rajeev ranjan sinha, learned counsel for the petitioners and mr. murlidhar, learned counsel for the state. the petitioners are apprehending arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under sections 341, 323, 379, 504 and 34 of the indian penal code. the accusations are of making assault with fists and slaps and committing theft. both sides are agnates and there appears to be a dispute from before with regard to share of the property, which clouds the bonafide of the accusation. moreover, the accusation has been ventilated through complaint. considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioners be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of rs.10000/(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of j.m. ist class, patna in 2 complaint case no. 2455 c of 2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. anil/ (dinesh kumar singh, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1920 o”

1. Arbind Prasad, 2. Smt. Kamod Devi, 3. Ravi Kumar alias Bittu, 4. Priya Ranjan, 5. Simpal Kumari, 6. Sanju Prasad alias Sanju Kumari, 7. Smt. Rekha Devi, 8. Nagendra Prasad, 9. Smt. Anita Devi, 10. Rakesh Kumar alias Chhotu Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 19.1.2012 Heard Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Murlidhar, learned counsel for the State. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under sections 341, 323, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusations are of making assault with fists and slaps and committing theft. Both sides are agnates and there appears to be a dispute from before with regard to share of the property, which clouds the bonafide of the accusation. Moreover, the accusation has been ventilated through complaint. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioners be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs.10000/(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M. Ist Class, Patna in 2 complaint case no. 2455 C of 2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Anil/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial