Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ravindra Yadav Vs. the State of Bihar

Ravindra Yadav vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 19, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975349

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ravindra Yadav

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.2513 of 2012 ravindra yadav, son of sahindra yadav, resident of village- fatehpur, police station- sultanganj, district- bhagalpur. .petitioner. versus the state of bihar .opposite party. ---------------------------------- 2.19. 01. 2012. heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the state. the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with complaint case no. 1625 of 2010 registered under sections 498a and 323 of the indian penal code and 4 of the dowry prohibition act. there is allegation of demand and subjecting cruelty. learned counsel for the petitioner however submits that he is ready to keep the complainant. however, in the order of the lower court refusing bail petition it has been mentioned that attempt was made for reconciliation between the petitioner and the complainant, but failed. learned counsel for the petitioner however offer that he is ready to keep the complainant and if the complainant is not ready with the petitioner then he is ready to pay rs. 800/- per month as maintenance. 2 having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the judicial magistrate, banka, in connection with complaint case no. 1625 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 (2) of cr.p.c. and further on conditions that petitioner shall either keep the complainant with due dignity or shall pay rs. 800/- per month in an account of the complainant or deposit in court to be withdrawn by the complainant-wife. m.p. ( gopal prasad, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2513 of 2012 Ravindra Yadav, son of Sahindra Yadav, resident of Village- Fatehpur, Police Station- Sultanganj, District- Bhagalpur. .Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar .Opposite Party. ---------------------------------- 2.

19. 01. 2012. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 1625 of 2010 registered under Sections 498A and 323 of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. There is allegation of demand and subjecting cruelty. Learned counsel for the petitioner however submits that he is ready to keep the complainant. However, in the order of the lower court refusing bail petition it has been mentioned that attempt was made for reconciliation between the petitioner and the complainant, but failed. Learned counsel for the petitioner however offer that he is ready to keep the complainant and if the complainant is not ready with the petitioner then he is ready to pay Rs. 800/- per month as maintenance. 2 Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Banka, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1625 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. and further on conditions that petitioner shall either keep the complainant with due dignity or shall pay Rs. 800/- per month in an account of the complainant or deposit in court to be withdrawn by the complainant-wife. m.p. ( Gopal Prasad, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial