islam and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.1811 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. islam 2. abdul. .... .... petitioners versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh oral order (per: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh”19. 01-2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the state. the petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under sections 436/34 of the indian penal code. initially, the petitioner was named in the f.i.r. when thrust of accusation was against bablu. during investigation, the petitioners were not sent up for trial whereas others were charge sheeted under section 435 of the ipc but differing with the same the cognizance has been taken under section 436/34 of the ipc against petitioners also. considering the fact that the accusation was not found true during investigation, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, araria in patna high court cr.misc. no.1811 of 2012 (2) dt.19-01-2012 2/2 connection with araria p.s. case no. 237/2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. (dinesh kumar singh, j.) amrendra